This comparison examines RPM and SHW, two prominent players in the specialty coatings and paints industry. Investors and traders interested in the materials sector, particularly those seeking exposure to construction, industrial, and consumer coatings markets, may find value in analyzing their relative performance. With both companies navigating macroeconomic pressures like commodity costs and housing market trends, this head-to-head review highlights recent stock behavior, financial metrics, and market positioning to aid informed decision-making in the current environment.
RPM International Inc. specializes in specialty coatings, sealants, and building products, serving consumer, industrial, and specialty markets worldwide. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced volatility following a strong Q3 earnings report on April 8, 2026, which featured record sales of $1.61 billion, up 8.9% year-over-year, and EPS of $0.57, significantly beating estimates. This drove a sharp rally, though shares have since moderated from highs near $110 to around $105, reflecting broader market pullbacks. Sentiment remains supported by robust margins and acquisition-driven growth, with a 52-week range of $92.92 to $129.12 and analyst targets averaging $128.
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is a global leader in paints, coatings, and related products, with strong retail and professional segments. Recent market activity shows stability around $338, with year-to-date gains of 4.45% outpacing peers amid anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings on April 28. The prior Q4 2025 results posted net sales up 2.1% to $23.57 billion, though EPS dipped 2.7% to $10.26, pressured by commodity inflation. Trading within a 52-week range of $301.58 to $379.65, SHW benefits from market share gains and dividend reliability, tempered by analyst adjustments on housing softness.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots selected from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across various strategies. These curated bots represent the most suitable performers in current market conditions, featuring diverse styles such as swing trading, pattern recognition, and momentum plays, with timeframes from intraday to long-term holds. Performance stats vary, often highlighting win rates above 60% and average annual returns in the double digits for top performers, based on backtested and live data. Traders can explore these bots to automate strategies tailored to stocks like RPM and SHW. Visit the page to discover which bots align with your trading goals.
Both RPM and SHW thrive in the cyclical coatings sector, exposed to construction and industrial demand. SHW's larger scale drives superior revenue ($23.57B TTM vs. $7.71B) and ROE, but at higher debt/equity (306% vs. 92%) and valuation multiples. RPM offers growth via M&A (mergers and acquisitions) and lower PEG ratio (1.78 vs. 2.93), appealing for value seekers, while SHW emphasizes premium pricing power and brand strength. Recent momentum favors RPM's earnings surprise over SHW's modest growth, though SHW shows lower beta risk in volatile markets. Sentiment tilts toward stability for the larger cap amid shared headwinds like raw material costs.
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward RPM based on trend consistency from its recent earnings beat, attractive forward P/E of 17.79, and relative undervaluation against SHW. While SHW offers scale and higher ROE, RPM's catalysts position it for potential outperformance in the near term, probabilistically favoring momentum traders.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RPM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSHW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RPM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHW’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
RPM (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +4.05% price change this week, while SHW (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +3.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.22%.
RPM is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.
SHW is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| RPM | SHW | RPM / SHW | |
| Capitalization | 14B | 79.5B | 18% |
| EBITDA | 1.15B | 4.56B | 25% |
| Gain YTD | 6.330 | -0.012 | -52,220% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.10 | 30.97 | 68% |
| Revenue | 7.71B | 23.9B | 32% |
| Total Cash | 294M | 217M | 135% |
| Total Debt | 2.9B | 13.8B | 21% |
RPM | SHW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 76 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RPM's Valuation (36) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SHW (88). This means that RPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SHW’s over the last 12 months.
RPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SHW (76). This means that RPM’s stock grew similarly to SHW’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's SMR Rating (18) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as RPM (42). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to RPM’s over the last 12 months.
RPM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as SHW (56). This means that RPM’s stock grew similarly to SHW’s over the last 12 months.
SHW's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as RPM (57). This means that SHW’s stock grew similarly to RPM’s over the last 12 months.
| RPM | SHW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 57% | 15 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 47% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPM has been closely correlated with SHW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RPM jumps, then SHW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RPM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPM | 100% | +0.59% | ||
| SHW - RPM | 77% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| PPG - RPM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| FUL - RPM | 70% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| AXTA - RPM | 67% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| AVNT - RPM | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||