Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RPMGX vs WFDSX
RPMGX vs WFDSX Comparison
Open Charts RPMGX vs WFDSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$101.43
Change+$0.86 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.53B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
Price$31.69
Change+$0.35 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets940.05M
RPMGX vs WFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RPMGX vs. WFDSX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RPMGX is a Hold and WFDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. WFDSX (940M). RPMGX (0.00) and WFDSX (0.00) have matching dividends . RPMGX was incepted earlier than WFDSX: RPMGX (33 years) vs WFDSX (19 years). WFDSX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). WFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RPMGX (22.60). RPMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDSX: RPMGX (2500) vs WFDSX (1000000). WFDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.48 vs. RPMGX (-5.04). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 3.34 vs. WFDSX (-21.61).
| RPMGX | WFDSX | RPMGX / WFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.89 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.92 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.842 | 1.032 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.5B | 940M | 2,926% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.04 | -0.48 | 1,058% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.76 | 30.37 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.34 | -21.61 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.60 | -15.11 | -150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement