Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSFLX vs TRIZX
RSFLX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.3B vs. RSFLX (405M). RSFLX pays higher dividends than TRIZX: RSFLX (9.59) vs TRIZX (8.25). RSFLX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: RSFLX (16 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). RSFLX (1.12) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. RSFLX (52.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSFLX: TRIZX (0) vs RSFLX (2500). RSFLX (8.88) and TRIZX (8.62) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 43.60 vs. RSFLX (30.12).
| RSFLX | TRIZX | RSFLX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.02 | 5,000% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.62 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.793 | 3.729 | 102% |
| Front Load | 2% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 405M | 4.3B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.59 | 8.25 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 8.62 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.46 | 34.49 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.12 | 43.60 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement