Ad is loading...
RSNVF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
STNRF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

RSNVF vs STNRF

Header iconRSNVF vs STNRF Comparison
Open Charts RSNVF vs STNRFBanner chart's image
Reyna Silver
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$61.45K
CapitalizationN/A
STINGER RES
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.23K
CapitalizationN/A
RSNVF vs STNRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RSNVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RSNVF vs. STNRF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSNVF is a StrongSell and STNRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (RSNVF: $0.09 vs. STNRF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: RSNVF and STNRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RSNVF: 27% vs. STNRF: 10%
Market capitalization -- RSNVF: $20.95M vs. STNRF: $1.5M
RSNVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $20.95M. STNRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.5M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RSNVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTNRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RSNVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STNRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STNRF is a better buy in the long-term than RSNVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RSNVF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RSNVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.

Price Growth

RSNVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.46% price change this week, while STNRF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNVF($21M) has a higher market cap than STNRF($1.5M). STNRF YTD gains are higher at: 42.178 vs. RSNVF (-48.354). STNRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1M vs. RSNVF (-8.27M). RSNVF has more cash in the bank: 7.88M vs. STNRF (2.99M). RSNVF (0) and STNRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RSNVFSTNRFRSNVF / STNRF
Capitalization21M1.5M1,402%
EBITDA-8.27M-1M824%
Gain YTD-48.35442.178-115%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash7.88M2.99M264%
Total DebtN/A24K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSNVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RSNVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADC75.970.38
+0.50%
Agree Realty Corp
DCBO46.83-0.63
-1.33%
Docebo
CSX35.13-0.50
-1.40%
CSX Corp
RMTI2.36-0.14
-5.42%
Rockwell Medical
AIRS6.51-0.45
-6.47%
AirSculpt Technologies

RSNVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RSNVF has been loosely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RSNVF jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNVF
1D Price
Change %
RSNVF100%
-4.54%
AG - RSNVF
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
PAAS - RSNVF
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
WPM - RSNVF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
GOLD - RSNVF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
HL - RSNVF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
More

STNRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STNRF and RIINF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STNRF and RIINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STNRF
1D Price
Change %
STNRF100%
N/A
RIINF - STNRF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILS - STNRF
20%
Poorly correlated
+13.48%
GMTNF - STNRF
13%
Poorly correlated
-6.06%
RSNVF - STNRF
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
MAUTF - STNRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
More