Ad is loading...
RTEAX vs SMBPX
RTEAX vs SMBPX Comparison
Open Charts RTEAX vs SMBPX
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.48
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.78B
Saratoga Municipal Bond I
Price$8.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets452.55K
RTEAX vs SMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RTEAX vs. SMBPX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RTEAX is a Hold and SMBPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 5.78B vs. SMBPX (453K). RTEAX pays higher dividends than SMBPX: RTEAX (3.25) vs SMBPX (1.16). RTEAX was incepted earlier than SMBPX: RTEAX (15 years) vs SMBPX (31 years). SMBPX (4.49) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). RTEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. SMBPX (36.00). RTEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMBPX: RTEAX (0) vs SMBPX (250). RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.12 vs. SMBPX (-0.47). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.76 vs. SMBPX (-2.48).
| RTEAX | SMBPX | RTEAX / SMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 4.49 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 4.49 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.968 | -1.484 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.78B | 453K | 1,275,717% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 1.16 | 280% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.12 | -0.47 | -238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.30 | -0.59 | -562% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.76 | -2.48 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.00 | -9.27 | 11% |