RUBLF vs TTLHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUBLF is a Hold and TTLHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUBLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTLHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- RUBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TTLHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
RUBLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.37% price change this week, while TTLHF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.87%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (-0.30% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| RUBLF | TTLHF | RUBLF / TTLHF | |
| Capitalization | 93.3M | 23.6M | 395% |
| EBITDA | 39.5M | -2.52M | -1,570% |
| Gain YTD | -3.910 | -76.200 | 5% |
| P/E Ratio | 2.86 | 40.82 | 7% |
| Revenue | 60.7M | 75.6K | 80,291% |
| Total Cash | 7.46M | 3.37M | 222% |
| Total Debt | 16M | 15K | 106,667% |
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KTEC | 13.31 | 0.09 | +0.68% |
| KraneShares Hang Seng TECH ETF | |||
| VEGA | 43.58 | 0.05 | +0.12% |
| AdvisorShares STAR Global Buy-Write ETF | |||
| TLH | 101.70 | -0.16 | -0.16% |
| iShares 10-20 Year Treasury Bond ETF | |||
| ISMD | 38.71 | -0.29 | -0.74% |
| Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF | |||
| ROM | 67.96 | -3.57 | -4.99% |
| ProShares Ultra Technology | |||
RUBLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RUBLF and VRN have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RUBLF and VRN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUBLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUBLF | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| VRN - RUBLF | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.08% | ||
| GTE - RUBLF | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.02% | ||
| AETUF - RUBLF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| BTE - RUBLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
| CNQ - RUBLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
TTLHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TTLHF and SRLY have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTLHF and SRLY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTLHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTLHF | 100% | +4.39% | ||
| SRLY - TTLHF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ITEEF - TTLHF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RGNNF - TTLHF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RUBLF - TTLHF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| KWTEF - TTLHF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||