RVLGF
Price
$0.36
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
44.6M
SBSW
Price
$7.55
Change
+$0.55 (+7.86%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
62 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

RVLGF vs SBSW

Header iconRVLGF vs SBSW Comparison
Open Charts RVLGF vs SBSWBanner chart's image
Revival Gold
Price$0.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$174.46K
Capitalization44.6M
Sibanye-Stillwater
Price$7.55
Change+$0.55 (+7.86%)
Volume$12.46M
Capitalization3.24B
RVLGF vs SBSW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RVLGF vs. SBSW commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RVLGF is a Hold and SBSW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RVLGF: $0.36 vs. SBSW: $7.55)
Brand notoriety: RVLGF and SBSW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RVLGF: 75% vs. SBSW: 120%
Market capitalization -- RVLGF: $44.6M vs. SBSW: $3.24B
RVLGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $44.6M. SBSW’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RVLGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBSW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RVLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBSW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBSW is a better buy in the long-term than RVLGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RVLGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBSW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RVLGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SBSW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RVLGF is a better buy in the short-term than SBSW.

Price Growth

RVLGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while SBSW (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

RVLGF is expected to report earnings on May 21, 2025.

SBSW is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBSW($3.24B) has a higher market cap than RVLGF($44.6M). SBSW YTD gains are higher at: 128.788 vs. RVLGF (79.104). SBSW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.7B vs. RVLGF (-8.61M). SBSW has more cash in the bank: 22.2B vs. RVLGF (1.03M). RVLGF has less debt than SBSW: RVLGF (249K) vs SBSW (26B). SBSW has higher revenues than RVLGF: SBSW (128B) vs RVLGF (0).
RVLGFSBSWRVLGF / SBSW
Capitalization44.6M3.24B1%
EBITDA-8.61M22.7B-0%
Gain YTD79.104128.78861%
P/E RatioN/A4.54-
Revenue0128B-
Total Cash1.03M22.2B0%
Total Debt249K26B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RVLGF vs SBSW: Fundamental Ratings
RVLGF
SBSW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5421
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10090
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3736
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10078
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBSW's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RVLGF (57). This means that SBSW’s stock grew somewhat faster than RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

SBSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RVLGF (100). This means that SBSW’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

RVLGF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SBSW (100). This means that RVLGF’s stock grew similarly to SBSW’s over the last 12 months.

SBSW's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RVLGF (37). This means that SBSW’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

SBSW's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as RVLGF (100). This means that SBSW’s stock grew similarly to RVLGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RVLGFSBSW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RVLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBSW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDVI24.490.20
+0.84%
FT Vest Ris Div Ach Trg Inc ETF
VSDA51.320.42
+0.83%
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
UNOV35.880.11
+0.32%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov
BGB12.06-0.01
-0.08%
Blackstone Strategic Credit 2027 Term Fund
ETHD16.03-0.08
-0.50%
Proshares UltraShort Ether ETF

RVLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RVLGF has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RVLGF jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RVLGF
1D Price
Change %
RVLGF100%
+0.95%
MAG - RVLGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
WPM - RVLGF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
SA - RVLGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
SBSW - RVLGF
30%
Poorly correlated
+7.86%
TORXF - RVLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

SBSW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBSW has been closely correlated with IMPUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBSW jumps, then IMPUY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBSW
1D Price
Change %
SBSW100%
+7.86%
IMPUY - SBSW
68%
Closely correlated
+5.30%
PAAS - SBSW
67%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
ANGPY - SBSW
67%
Closely correlated
+8.60%
HMY - SBSW
66%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
AU - SBSW
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More