Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RWEBX vs SLGFX
RWEBX vs SLGFX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs SLGFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$64.07
Change+$0.37 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.58B
SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT)
Price$21.04
Change+$0.13 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
RWEBX vs SLGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. SLGFX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a Buy and SLGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. SLGFX (1.18B). SLGFX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: SLGFX (1.02) vs RWEBX (0.80). RWEBX was incepted earlier than SLGFX: RWEBX (11 years) vs SLGFX (7 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than SLGFX (0.64). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SLGFX (4.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGFX: RWEBX (250) vs SLGFX (100000). SLGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.64 vs. RWEBX (6.78). SLGFX return over 5 years is better than : 97.05 vs. RWEBX (52.08).
| RWEBX | SLGFX | RWEBX / SLGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.25 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.64 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.188 | 6.339 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201B | 1.18B | 17,048% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.02 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.78 | 9.64 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.65 | 59.22 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.08 | 97.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.97 | N/A | - |