Ad is loading...
RWEBX vs SLGFX
RWEBX vs SLGFX Comparison
Open Charts RWEBX vs SLGFX
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$58.79
Change+$0.76 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.73B
SEI Large Cap Index F (SIMT)
Price$18.04
Change+$0.29 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets998.91M
RWEBX vs SLGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RWEBX vs. SLGFX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RWEBX is a Buy and SLGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. SLGFX (999M). SLGFX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: SLGFX (1.13) vs RWEBX (0.83). RWEBX was incepted earlier than SLGFX: RWEBX (11 years) vs SLGFX (7 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than SLGFX (0.64). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. SLGFX (4.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SLGFX: RWEBX (250) vs SLGFX (100000). SLGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. RWEBX (-2.39). SLGFX return over 5 years is better than : 90.16 vs. RWEBX (47.28).
| RWEBX | SLGFX | RWEBX / SLGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.25 | 424% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.64 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.919 | -9.955 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177B | 999M | 17,718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.13 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | 1.47 | -163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.52 | 23.09 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.28 | 90.16 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...