Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RYCDX vs UCPIX
RYCDX vs UCPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RYCDX vs. UCPIX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RYCDX is a Hold and UCPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RYCDX has more cash in the bank: 15M vs. UCPIX (4.03M). RYCDX pays higher dividends than UCPIX: RYCDX (9.72) vs UCPIX (4.47). RYCDX was incepted earlier than UCPIX: RYCDX (24 years) vs UCPIX (22 years). RYCDX (2.58) is less costly to investors than UCPIX (2.41). RYCDX has a lower initial minimum investment than UCPIX: RYCDX (2500) vs UCPIX (15000). UCPIX IRA initial investment is lower compared to RYCDX: UCPIX (15000) vs RYCDX (1000). UCPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -18.41 vs. RYCDX (-46.47). UCPIX return over 5 years is better than : -74.36 vs. RYCDX (-88.84).
| RYCDX | UCPIX | RYCDX / UCPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 1.78 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.58 | 2.41 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -25.687 | -5.536 | 464% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 15000 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 15000 | 7% |
| Net Assets | 15M | 4.03M | 372% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.72 | 4.47 | 217% |
| Returns for 1 year | -46.47 | -18.41 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | -76.18 | -41.58 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | -88.84 | -74.36 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | -99.13 | -94.27 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement