Ad is loading...
SAMBX vs TRIZX
SAMBX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.04B vs. SAMBX (1.34B). SAMBX pays higher dividends than TRIZX: SAMBX (9.45) vs TRIZX (8.63). SAMBX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: SAMBX (19 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). SAMBX (0.78) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). SAMBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 110.00 vs. TRIZX (77.90). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than SAMBX: TRIZX (0) vs SAMBX (100000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. SAMBX (6.24). TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 44.78 vs. SAMBX (41.41).
| SAMBX | TRIZX | SAMBX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.02 | 3,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.62 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.953 | 0.176 | -540% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 4.04B | 33% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.45 | 8.63 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.24 | 7.43 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.75 | 24.30 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.41 | 44.78 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...