It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SASKF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTROYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SASKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
SASKF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.11% price change this week, while TROYF (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
SASKF | TROYF | SASKF / TROYF | |
Capitalization | 104M | 10.3M | 1,010% |
EBITDA | -1.3M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -51.515 | -72.125 | 71% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 39.8M | 108K | 36,852% |
Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
SASKF | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SUIAX | 48.68 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
DWS CROCI International A | |||
CFSMX | 14.77 | -0.12 | -0.81% |
Clarkston Partners Founders | |||
LMVYX | 32.57 | -0.27 | -0.82% |
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value I | |||
RWEBX | 63.81 | -0.73 | -1.13% |
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E | |||
WCEAX | 19.35 | -0.27 | -1.38% |
Delaware Ivy Core Equity Fund Class A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SASKF and WRLGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SASKF and WRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SASKF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SASKF | 100% | +12.80% | ||
WRLGF - SASKF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
EXNRF - SASKF | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.41% | ||
ARMN - SASKF | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
DPMLF - SASKF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.08% | ||
THM - SASKF | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.48% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TROYF and BDLNF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TROYF and BDLNF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TROYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TROYF | 100% | +0.29% | ||
BDLNF - TROYF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
OPWEF - TROYF | 20% Poorly correlated | +10.86% | ||
SASKF - TROYF | 12% Poorly correlated | +12.80% | ||
PLGDF - TROYF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HMRFF - TROYF | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.96% | ||
More |