Comparing SBCF and VLY offers investors a window into two distinct regional banking stories unfolding in the current market environment. Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida is a fast-consolidating Florida-based franchise leveraging strategic acquisitions to deepen its presence in one of the country's most demographically attractive regions. Valley National Bancorp, headquartered in Morristown, New Jersey, is a considerably larger regional player with a multi-state footprint that has been executing a disciplined balance-sheet restructuring. For traders and investors evaluating the regional banking sector, this head-to-head comparison highlights how differing strategies, geographic exposures, and scale can drive divergent performance profiles even within the same industry.
Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida, the holding company for Seacoast National Bank, provides integrated financial services — including commercial and consumer banking, wealth management, and mortgage and insurance services — primarily across Florida. The company has been one of the more active consolidators in the Southeast regional banking space. In recent months, SBCF completed two transformative acquisitions: Heartland Bancshares, Inc. closed in July 2025, adding approximately $153 million in loans and $705 million in deposits across four Central Florida branches; and Villages Bancorporation, Inc. (VBI), which closed in October 2025, adding roughly $1.2 billion in loans, $3.5 billion in deposits, and 19 branches in the rapidly growing Villages® community in North Central Florida.
The combined impact of these deals has meaningfully expanded Seacoast's balance sheet and revenue-generating capacity. In the fourth quarter of 2025, net revenues surged to $203.3 million, a 29% sequential increase, while net interest income (NII) grew 31% quarter-over-quarter to $174.6 million. The company's net interest margin expanded to 3.66%, reflecting disciplined deposit cost management and higher loan yields. Tangible book value per share rose 9% year-over-year, and the bank maintains a Tier 1 capital ratio above 14.5% — placing it among the stronger capitalized institutions in the industry. In recent market activity, SBCF shares have traded near the $33 level, within a 52-week range of approximately $27 to $36, supported by steady organic loan growth and integration progress on the acquisitions.
Valley National Bancorp, the holding company for Valley National Bank, operates across Consumer Banking, Commercial Banking, and Treasury and Corporate segments, with a diversified loan portfolio spanning commercial and industrial (C&I) loans, commercial real estate (CRE), residential mortgages, and consumer auto loans. With total assets of approximately $62 billion and a market capitalization near $7.9 billion, VLY is a substantially larger institution than SBCF.
Valley's recent performance has been defined by a compelling earnings turnaround. After navigating elevated credit provisioning and net charge-offs through 2024, the bank's profitability metrics have steadily improved. In the fourth quarter of 2025, VLY posted record net income of approximately $195 million, or $0.33 per diluted share, with an adjusted return on average assets (ROA) reaching 1.14%. Core deposit growth of nearly $4 billion (9% year-over-year) underpinned the earnings improvement, while the net interest margin expanded to 3.17%. The efficiency ratio — a measure of non-interest expense relative to revenue — has trended downward toward 50%, reflecting operational leverage. In recent weeks, the stock has traded around $14, not far below its 52-week high near $15, and analyst price targets have been revised upward, with the consensus target around $16.53. The stock's one-year total return of over 56% reflects the market's recognition of the bank's improving fundamentals.
For investors seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like SBCF and VLY, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate shifting market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each employing distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and statistical profiles. Only the most effective and market-adapted bots earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section — a curated list that highlights those with strong recent performance and alignment with current market dynamics. Bots featured in this section have demonstrated annualized returns ranging from modest single digits to well above 30%, depending on strategy and risk profile. Whether an investor prefers short-term swing trading or longer-term trend-following approaches, this curated hub provides a practical starting point for exploring algorithmic trading. Visit the Trending AI Robots page to explore the currently featured bots and discover which strategies are thriving in today's market.
While both SBCF and VLY operate as regional bank holding companies, their profiles diverge in several important ways. From a scale perspective, VLY is roughly 2.4 times larger by market capitalization ($7.9 billion versus $3.3 billion), with a correspondingly larger balance sheet and loan portfolio. This scale gives VLY advantages in diversification — spanning commercial, industrial, CRE, residential mortgage, and auto lending — but also exposes it to a broader set of credit environments.
Geographic exposure is another key differentiator. SBCF is concentrated in Florida, one of the fastest-growing states in the U.S. in terms of population and economic activity, and its recent acquisitions deepen its penetration in demographically attractive markets. VLY, by contrast, operates across multiple states including New Jersey, New York, Florida, and Alabama, offering a more geographically diversified revenue base.
On profitability metrics, SBCF maintains a higher net interest margin (3.66% in its most recent quarter) compared to VLY (3.17%), reflecting a lower-cost deposit base and favorable loan mix. However, VLY has shown stronger momentum in earnings growth and margin expansion recently. In terms of valuation, VLY trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of roughly 12 to 13 times trailing earnings, while SBCF carries a P/E closer to 18 to 19 times — a premium partially justified by its higher growth profile and acquisition-driven expansion. Credit quality trends have improved at both banks: VLY saw net charge-offs decline meaningfully in recent quarters, while SBCF has consistently highlighted its disciplined underwriting. Dividend yield favors VLY at approximately 3.1% versus SBCF at approximately 0.7%.
Based on observable trends, an AI-driven evaluation would likely identify VLY as the more compelling near-to-medium-term candidate, while acknowledging SBCF's structural advantages. VLY's combination of accelerating earnings momentum, expanding margins, declining credit costs, lower valuation multiples, and upward analyst target revisions creates a convergence of positive signals that algorithmic models tend to favor. The stock's significant one-year outperformance and improving efficiency ratio suggest trend consistency that AI systems typically reward. Meanwhile, SBCF offers a higher-quality margin profile and a compelling long-term growth narrative rooted in Florida's demographic tailwinds, but faces near-term integration risk from its two recent acquisitions — a variable that can introduce earnings unpredictability. In probabilistic terms, an AI model would likely assign a higher confidence score to VLY under current conditions, while recognizing that SBCF's franchise value may appreciate substantially if its acquisition integrations proceed smoothly over the coming quarters.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SBCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SBCF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
SBCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.72% price change this week, while VLY (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.56%.
SBCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
VLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| SBCF | VLY | SBCF / VLY | |
| Capitalization | 3.23B | 7.94B | 41% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.162 | 24.949 | 29% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.32 | 12.16 | 184% |
| Revenue | 676M | 2.09B | 32% |
| Total Cash | 201M | 362M | 56% |
| Total Debt | 888M | 2.98B | 30% |
SBCF | VLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VLY's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (68). This means that VLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
VLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (85). This means that VLY’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
VLY's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (42). This means that VLY’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
VLY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (47). This means that VLY’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.
SBCF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as VLY (50). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to VLY’s over the last 12 months.
| SBCF | VLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 62% | 13 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 5 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBCF | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| UBSI - SBCF | 87% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| ASB - SBCF | 86% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| FULT - SBCF | 86% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| UCB - SBCF | 86% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| FNB - SBCF | 86% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||