SBCF
Price
$28.57
Change
+$0.78 (+2.81%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.1B
78 days until earnings call
WAL
Price
$86.59
Change
+$2.20 (+2.61%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
71 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SBCF vs WAL

Header iconSBCF vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts SBCF vs WALBanner chart's image
Seacoast Banking
Price$28.57
Change+$0.78 (+2.81%)
Volume$10.42K
Capitalization2.1B
Western Alliance Ban
Price$86.59
Change+$2.20 (+2.61%)
Volume$791.91K
Capitalization6.88B
SBCF vs WAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBCF vs. WAL commentary
Feb 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBCF is a StrongBuy and WAL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SBCF: $28.57 vs. WAL: $86.59)
Brand notoriety: SBCF and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBCF: 86% vs. WAL: 70%
Market capitalization -- SBCF: $2.1B vs. WAL: $6.88B
SBCF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.1B. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WAL is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBCF is a better buy in the short-term than WAL.

Price Growth

SBCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

WAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.74% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAL($6.88B) has a higher market cap than SBCF($2.1B). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than WAL: SBCF (20.13) vs WAL (9.55). SBCF (3.778) and WAL (3.651) have similar YTD gains . WAL has more cash in the bank: 289M vs. SBCF (168M). SBCF has less debt than WAL: SBCF (156M) vs WAL (8.12B). WAL has higher revenues than SBCF: WAL (2.13B) vs SBCF (567M).
SBCFWALSBCF / WAL
Capitalization2.1B6.88B31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.7783.651103%
P/E Ratio20.139.55211%
Revenue567M2.13B27%
Total Cash168M289M58%
Total Debt156M8.12B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBCF vs WAL: Fundamental Ratings
SBCF
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
153
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9663
SMR RATING
1..100
138
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4746
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6222
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WAL's Valuation (72) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (75). This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (96). This means that WAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (13). This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (47). This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (62). This means that WAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBCFWAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXC68.291.17
+1.74%
Invesco CurrencyShares® Canadian Dollar
EWT51.760.75
+1.47%
iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
VWID27.710.37
+1.35%
Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
CZA106.870.14
+0.13%
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF
CLOA51.83N/A
+0.01%
iShares AAA CLO Active ETF