SBHGF vs TBMC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBHGF is a Hold and TBMC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SBHGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTBMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SBHGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TBMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SBHGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TBMC’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SBHGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TBMC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
SBHGF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +11.22% price change this week, while TBMC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.23%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (-0.78% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| SBHGF | TBMC | SBHGF / TBMC | |
| Capitalization | 7.97B | 95.6M | 8,334% |
| EBITDA | 235B | -641.8K | -36,615,996% |
| Gain YTD | 21.885 | 6.215 | 352% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.22 | 55.79 | 24% |
| Revenue | 1.31T | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 4.87T | 676K | 721,005,917% |
| Total Debt | 5.12T | 325K | 1,573,846,154% |
SBHGF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SBHGF | TBMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 12% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 13% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 16% |
SBHGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SBHGF and PWUPU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBHGF and PWUPU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SBHGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBHGF | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| PWUPU - SBHGF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NFTN - SBHGF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TBMC - SBHGF | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISRL - SBHGF | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| NETD - SBHGF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
TBMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TBMC and IVCB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TBMC and IVCB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TBMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBMC | 100% | N/A | ||
| IVCB - TBMC | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HCVIU - TBMC | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
| NVAC - TBMC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DPCS - TBMC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLBR - TBMC | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
More | ||||