SBLK
Price
$29.05
Change
+$0.31 (+1.08%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.24B
94 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZIM
Price
$28.14
Change
+$1.32 (+4.92%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.39B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SBLK vs ZIM

SBLK vs ZIM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBLK vs. ZIM commentary
Aug 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBLK is a StrongBuy and ZIM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2026
Stock price -- (SBLK: $29.05 vs. ZIM: $28.14)
Brand notoriety: SBLK and ZIM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBLK: 87% vs. ZIM: 302%
Market capitalization -- SBLK: $3.24B vs. ZIM: $3.39B
SBLK [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $3.24B. ZIM’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $3.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $1.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBLK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZIM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SBLK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZIM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZIM is a better buy in the long-term than SBLK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBLK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZIM’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBLK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZIM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZIM is a better buy in the short-term than SBLK.

Price Growth

SBLK (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while ZIM (@Marine Shipping) price change was +4.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBLK is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.

ZIM is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.14% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZIM($3.39B) and SBLK($3.24B) have the same market capitalization . ZIM has higher P/E ratio than SBLK: ZIM (34.32) vs SBLK (11.39). SBLK YTD gains are higher at: 56.427 vs. ZIM (37.021). ZIM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.93B vs. SBLK (370M). ZIM has more cash in the bank: 1.63B vs. SBLK (39.4M). SBLK has less debt than ZIM: SBLK (1.1B) vs ZIM (5.48B). ZIM has higher revenues than SBLK: ZIM (6.29B) vs SBLK (1.09B).
SBLKZIMSBLK / ZIM
Capitalization3.24B3.39B96%
EBITDA370M1.93B19%
Gain YTD56.42737.021152%
P/E Ratio11.3934.3233%
Revenue1.09B6.29B17%
Total Cash39.4M1.63B2%
Total Debt1.1B5.48B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBLK: Fundamental Ratings
SBLK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBLKZIM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZIM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SSG11.370.15
+1.34%
ProShares UltraShort Semiconductors
HYEM20.070.02
+0.10%
VanEck EM High Yield Bond ETF
EMTY23.15N/A
N/A
ProShares Decline of the Retl Store ETF
GEW57.29-0.11
-0.20%
Cambria Global EW ETF
IYH70.65-0.46
-0.65%
iShares US Healthcare ETF

SBLK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBLK has been closely correlated with GNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBLK jumps, then GNK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBLK
1D Price
Change %
SBLK100%
+1.08%
GNK - SBLK
71%
Closely correlated
+1.35%
SHIP - SBLK
66%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
NMM - SBLK
66%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
SB - SBLK
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
HSHP - SBLK
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.47%
More

ZIM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZIM has been loosely correlated with GSL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZIM jumps, then GSL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZIM
1D Price
Change %
ZIM100%
+4.92%
GSL - ZIM
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
SHIP - ZIM
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
MATX - ZIM
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
CMRE - ZIM
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
SBLK - ZIM
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
More