SBMFF
Price
$0.41
Change
-$0.01 (-2.38%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Capitalization
6.79B
SRBCF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
9.89M
Ad is loading...

SBMFF vs SRBCF

Header iconSBMFF vs SRBCF Comparison
Open Charts SBMFF vs SRBCFBanner chart's image
Sino Biopharmaceutical
Price$0.41
Change-$0.01 (-2.38%)
Volume$3.69K
Capitalization6.79B
Sirona Biochem
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$108K
Capitalization9.89M
SBMFF vs SRBCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SBMFF vs. SRBCF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SBMFF is a Hold and SRBCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (SBMFF: $0.41 vs. SRBCF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: SBMFF and SRBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SBMFF: 126% vs. SRBCF: 171%
Market capitalization -- SBMFF: $6.79B vs. SRBCF: $9.89M
SBMFF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $6.79B. SRBCF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $9.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $368.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SBMFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSRBCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SBMFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SRBCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBMFF is a better buy in the long-term than SRBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBMFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRBCF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SBMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SRBCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBMFF is a better buy in the short-term than SRBCF.

Price Growth

SBMFF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SRBCF (@Biotechnology) price change was -7.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-1.44% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBMFF($6.8B) has a higher market cap than SRBCF($9.89M). SBMFF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SRBCF (-11.648). SBMFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.98B vs. SRBCF (-2.03M). SBMFF has higher revenues than SRBCF: SBMFF (26.2B) vs SRBCF (-12.09K).
SBMFFSRBCFSBMFF / SRBCF
Capitalization6.8B9.89M68,720%
EBITDA6.98B-2.03M-343,323%
Gain YTD0.000-11.648-
P/E Ratio25.58N/A-
Revenue26.2B-12.09K-216,690,100%
Total CashN/A27.3K-
Total DebtN/A2.73M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBMFF vs SRBCF: Fundamental Ratings
SBMFF
SRBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
97100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBMFF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SRBCF (95). This means that SBMFF’s stock grew significantly faster than SRBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBCF (100). This means that SBMFF’s stock grew similarly to SRBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMFF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBCF (100). This means that SBMFF’s stock grew similarly to SRBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMFF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBCF (64). This means that SBMFF’s stock grew similarly to SRBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMFF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBCF (100). This means that SBMFF’s stock grew similarly to SRBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBMFFSRBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SBMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUERX13.620.07
+0.52%
Auer Growth
NAPIX58.550.29
+0.50%
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp I
HRIDX12.100.06
+0.50%
Harbor Diversified Intl All Cp Admin
MMUJX22.950.08
+0.35%
MFS Utilities R4
WCMIX22.360.05
+0.22%
WCM Focused International Growth Instl

SBMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMFF and PSTV have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMFF and PSTV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMFF
1D Price
Change %
SBMFF100%
N/A
PSTV - SBMFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.69%
BCDA - SBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
INKT - SBMFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.77%
ALZN - SBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
LYEL - SBMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.97%
More

SRBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRBCF and BCLI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRBCF and BCLI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRBCF
1D Price
Change %
SRBCF100%
N/A
BCLI - SRBCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.03%
PRTG - SRBCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.54%
TRRI - SRBCF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VBIZF - SRBCF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBMFF - SRBCF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More