SCCAF vs SIETY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCCAF is a Hold and SIETY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SCCAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSIETY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- SCCAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SIETY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
SCCAF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIETY (@Specialty Stores) price change was +2.30% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.89%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-0.37% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| SCCAF | SIETY | SCCAF / SIETY | |
| Capitalization | 741M | 9.29B | 8% |
| EBITDA | 191M | 520M | 37% |
| Gain YTD | 33.457 | 14.457 | 231% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.82 | 27.47 | 54% |
| Revenue | 935M | 4.72B | 20% |
| Total Cash | 37.4M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 488M | N/A | - |
SCCAF | SIETY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SCCAF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (21). This means that SCCAF’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
SIETY's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCCAF (48). This means that SIETY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCCAF’s over the last 12 months.
SCCAF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIETY (91). This means that SCCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
SCCAF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SIETY (59). This means that SCCAF’s stock grew similarly to SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
SCCAF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SIETY (66). This means that SCCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SIETY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
SCCAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCAF has been loosely correlated with EICCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCCAF jumps, then EICCF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCCAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCCAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EICCF - SCCAF | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SIETY - SCCAF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNROF - SCCAF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SIEVF - SCCAF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TLF - SCCAF | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
SIETY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SIETY and SCCAF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIETY and SCCAF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIETY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIETY | 100% | N/A | ||
| SCCAF - SIETY | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KMX - SIETY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| CARG - SIETY | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.60% | ||
| EICCF - SIETY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PAG - SIETY | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||