SCHG
Price
$32.62
Change
-$0.36 (-1.09%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
57.54B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SPMO
Price
$159.64
Change
+$5.85 (+3.80%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
21.33B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHG vs SPMO

SCHG vs SPMO Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) vs. Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO)

Key Takeaways

  • SCHG offers broad exposure to large-cap U.S. growth stocks via a passive index tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, with approximately 197 holdings and a low 0.04% expense ratio.
  • SPMO employs a momentum strategy, selecting the top 100 S&P 500 stocks with the strongest recent price performance adjusted for volatility, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio and a 0.13% expense ratio.
  • Sector allocations in both ETFs tilt heavily toward technology, though SPMO exhibits greater concentration in high-momentum names within information technology and industrials.
  • SCHG provides wider diversification across growth-oriented companies, while SPMO dynamically rotates toward recent outperformers, introducing potential for higher turnover and distinct risk-return characteristics.
  • Both funds target large-cap U.S. equities with growth or momentum themes, positioning them as complementary rather than direct competitors for investors seeking exposure to strong-performing segments of the market.
  • Cost efficiency favors SCHG, whereas SPMO emphasizes factor-based selection that may align with periods of pronounced market trends or sector rotations.

Introduction

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) represent two distinct approaches to large-cap U.S. equity exposure. SCHG delivers comprehensive growth-style coverage, while SPMO applies a rules-based momentum overlay within the S&P 500. Investors comparing these ETFs often evaluate trade-offs between broad growth participation and factor-driven selection that targets recent price strength. In the current environment of technological innovation and shifting market leadership, these funds offer alternative pathways to similar investor objectives of capital appreciation within established U.S. companies. The comparison highlights structural differences that influence long-term positioning and risk profiles.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is a passively managed fund that seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. This index measures the performance of large-cap growth stocks selected from the broader U.S. equity market based on growth characteristics such as earnings and revenue expansion. The ETF holds approximately 197 securities, providing diversified exposure across the growth segment. Top holdings typically include leading technology and consumer companies such as NVIDIA, Apple, and Microsoft. Sector allocations are dominated by information technology (around 45%), followed by communication services (approximately 15-16%) and consumer discretionary (around 12-13%). The expense ratio stands at 0.04%, reflecting its low-cost, index-replicating structure. SCHG employs full replication methodology with periodic rebalancing aligned to the index, emphasizing liquidity and broad market representation without active stock selection.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) Overview

The Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) is a passively managed fund designed to track the S&P 500 Momentum Index. This index selects approximately 100 stocks from the S&P 500 with the highest momentum scores, calculated from 12-month price performance excluding the most recent month and scaled by volatility. The ETF maintains a concentrated portfolio of roughly 100-101 holdings. Sector weights fluctuate with momentum trends but frequently emphasize information technology (near 49-53%), industrials (around 12-14%), and communication services. The expense ratio is 0.13%. SPMO uses a rules-based, non-discretionary approach with semi-annual rebalancing to maintain alignment with the momentum index, resulting in a factor-tilted strategy that prioritizes recent relative strength over static growth classification.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the large-cap U.S. equity space, where technological advancement, artificial intelligence adoption, and corporate earnings growth serve as primary catalysts. Capital flows into innovation-driven sectors have supported elevated valuations in technology and related areas during recent market cycles. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate expectations and economic expansion influence investor appetite for growth and momentum strategies. Regulatory developments around technology competition and data privacy present ongoing considerations, while sector risks include valuation compression if growth slows or if broader market rotations favor value or defensive areas. These dynamics shape the environment for large-cap strategies emphasizing either consistent growth profiles or price momentum.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SCHG has delivered exposure aligned with sustained growth in established large-cap names, benefiting from steady contributions across its diversified holdings during periods of broad technology leadership. SPMO, by contrast, has shown sensitivity to momentum shifts, potentially capturing outsized gains when a narrower group of strong performers dominates but experiencing greater variability during rotations away from recent leaders. Relative positioning highlights SCHG's emphasis on structural growth characteristics versus SPMO's focus on trend persistence. Volatility differences arise from SPMO's concentration and rebalancing, which can amplify responses to sector-specific catalysts compared with SCHG's broader base. Both have participated in large-cap rallies tied to earnings cycles and macroeconomic tailwinds, with positioning reflecting their respective index methodologies rather than short-term price fluctuations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favor to SCHG due to its lower expense ratio, greater diversification across growth holdings, and consistent alignment with broad large-cap growth trends. SPMO offers compelling momentum exposure that may suit environments with pronounced factor leadership, yet the higher cost and concentration introduce additional considerations around turnover and relative risk. The assessment remains probabilistic and centers on durable characteristics rather than any guarantee of future outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHG vs. SPMO commentary
Jun 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Hold and SPMO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 57.5B vs. SPMO (21.3B). SPMO has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: SPMO (29.452) vs SCHG (0.226). SCHG was incepted earlier than SPMO: SCHG (17 years) vs SPMO (11 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than SPMO (0.13). SPMO has a higher turnover SCHG (27.00) vs SCHG (27.00).
SCHGSPMOSCHG / SPMO
Gain YTD0.22629.4521%
Net Assets57.5B21.3B270%
Total Expense Ratio0.040.1331%
Turnover27.0044.0061%
Yield0.360.6753%
Fund Existence17 years11 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHGSPMO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SPMO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIBL129.527.59
+6.22%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Bl 3X ETF
FFDI32.450.33
+1.02%
Fidelity Fundamental Developed International ETF
IVOO129.341.13
+0.88%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF
ICLO25.58N/A
N/A
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF
ISBG10.65-0.15
-1.42%
Incomestkd 1X Bitcoin & 1X Gold Premium ETF

SPMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPMO has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPMO jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPMO
1D Price
Change %
SPMO100%
-0.36%
LRCX - SPMO
73%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
AMAT - SPMO
70%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
KLAC - SPMO
69%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
AVGO - SPMO
68%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
ETN - SPMO
67%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More