Ad is loading...
SCHG vs TMFE
SCHG vs TMFE Comparison
Open Charts SCHG vs TMFE
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$28.01
Change-$0.72 (-2.51%)
Volume$11.07M
Net Assets39.61B
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 ETF
Price$27.28
Change-$0.54 (-1.94%)
Volume$40.45K
Net Assets77.92M
SCHG vs TMFE Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHG vs. TMFE commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Hold and TMFE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 39.6B vs. TMFE (77.9M). TMFE has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: TMFE (5.579) vs SCHG (3.086). SCHG was incepted earlier than TMFE: SCHG (15 years) vs TMFE (3 years). TMFE has a higher turnover SCHG (9.00) vs SCHG (9.00).
| SCHG | TMFE | SCHG / TMFE | |
| Gain YTD | 3.086 | 5.579 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 39.6B | 77.9M | 50,834% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 9.00 | 25.00 | 36% |
| Yield | 0.43 | 0.40 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHG | TMFE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.62% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AMZN - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.65% | ||
| KLAC - SCHG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||
TMFE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFE has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFE jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFE | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| SNPS - TMFE | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| ANET - TMFE | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| LRCX - TMFE | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| MSFT - TMFE | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| PSTG - TMFE | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||