SCHG
Price
$30.45
Change
+$0.10 (+0.33%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Net Assets
50.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VONG
Price
$114.63
Change
+$0.60 (+0.53%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Net Assets
44.95B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SCHG vs VONG

Header iconSCHG vs VONG Comparison
Open Charts SCHG vs VONGBanner chart's image
SCHG vs VONG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) vs. Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG)

Key Takeaways

  • SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index with 198 holdings and a 0.04% expense ratio, offering cost efficiency over VONG's 0.06% fee and 391 holdings.
  • Both ETFs exhibit heavy technology sector exposure, with VONG at approximately 60% and SCHG around 44%, alongside significant allocations to communication services and consumer discretionary.
  • Top holdings overlap substantially, including NVDA (10-12%), AAPL (9-11%), and MSFT (7-9%), driving similar growth-oriented exposure profiles.
  • VONG provides broader diversification through more holdings, potentially reducing concentration risk compared to SCHG's more focused portfolio.
  • In recent market cycles, both have shown comparable volatility and performance dynamics, influenced by large-cap growth momentum in AI and technology sectors.
  • Liquidity remains strong for both, with tight bid-ask spreads under 0.03%, supporting efficient trading for investors.

Introduction

Comparing SCHG and VONG is timely amid sustained investor interest in large-cap growth strategies. Both ETFs target U.S. large-cap growth equities, competing directly for allocations seeking capital appreciation from technology leaders and innovative sectors. While they overlap significantly in holdings and sector exposure, subtle differences in index methodology, diversification, and costs offer alternatives for optimizing growth portfolios. In the current environment of AI-driven capital flows and moderating interest rates, these funds highlight structural nuances in pursuing similar investor goals of long-term outperformance versus broader benchmarks.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) Overview

The Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is a passive ETF that seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, comprising the largest 750 U.S. companies classified as growth based on factors like projected earnings growth. It holds approximately 198 stocks, providing focused exposure to large-cap growth. Top holdings include NVDA (11%), AAPL (10%), MSFT (8%), AMZN (5%), and Alphabet classes around 4% each. Sector allocations emphasize technology (44%), communication services (16%), and consumer discretionary (13%), with health care at 9%. The expense ratio is a low 0.04%, and portfolio turnover stands at 15%. As a structurally efficient, non-leveraged fund listed on NYSE Arca, SCHG offers high liquidity with a 0.03% median bid-ask spread.

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) Overview

The Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) passively tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index, measuring large-capitalization U.S. growth stocks from the Russell 1000 universe. It maintains around 391 holdings for broader diversification. Top holdings feature NVDA (12.7%), AAPL (10.8%), MSFT (9.2%), AMZN (4.8%), and AVGO (4.6%). Sector weights are led by technology (60%), consumer discretionary (18%), industrials (9%), and health care (8%). With an expense ratio of 0.06% and low turnover of 10%, VONG employs full replication on Nasdaq, ensuring tight tracking. Its structure supports excellent liquidity, evidenced by a 0.01% median bid-ask spread.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The large-cap growth sector, dominated by technology and AI innovators, faces a dynamic environment in 2026. Massive capital expenditures by hyperscalers—projected over $500 billion—fuel AI infrastructure, data centers, and semiconductors, driving productivity gains and earnings growth. Capital flows concentrate in mega-cap names like NVDA and MSFT, supported by moderating inflation and potential interest rate stabilization. Sector catalysts include AI adoption broadening beyond chatbots to complex applications, alongside policy incentives for business investment. Risks encompass elevated valuations, capex monetization challenges, and geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains. Macro shifts, such as steady U.S. GDP growth and fiscal stimulus, bolster the backdrop for growth-oriented exposures.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, SCHG and VONG have exhibited closely aligned performance, reflecting shared exposure to large-cap growth drivers. Year-to-date through early 2026, both declined around 5%, with VONG slightly outperforming at -4.4% versus SCHG's -5.3%, amid tech sector volatility from AI capex concerns. Over longer cycles, they delivered similar returns, such as 18-20% over the prior year, tied to earnings strength in top holdings and sector rotation toward AI beneficiaries. Volatility profiles are comparable, with betas near 1.18-1.19 and max drawdowns in the mid-30% range over five years. SCHG's relative positioning benefits from lower costs in prolonged uptrends, while VONG's broader holdings may offer marginally better resilience during rotations away from mega-caps, influenced by interest rate expectations and commodity trends impacting tech infrastructure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's strongest AI-powered trading bots under prevailing market conditions. Tickeron provides hundreds of AI bots scanning thousands of tickers across various timeframes, strategies, and performance metrics like win rates and profit factors. The curated trending section highlights top performers adapting to volatility in sectors like technology and growth equities. These bots employ pattern recognition, trend following, and mean reversion tactics, offering investors data-driven signals without emotional bias. Explore the page to identify bots aligned with large-cap growth trends or broader market rotations, and consider integrating them for enhanced decision-making in dynamic environments.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SCHG due to its superior cost efficiency (0.04% expense ratio), strong trend consistency in large-cap growth cycles, and balanced sector momentum. While VONG offers greater diversification, SCHG's lower fees and focused exposure to high-conviction growth names position it probabilistically better for capturing AI-driven upside amid stable macro conditions, assuming continued tech leadership.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SCHG vs. VONG commentary
Apr 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHG is a Buy and VONG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 50.6B vs. VONG (44.9B). VONG has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHG: VONG (-5.729) vs SCHG (-6.537). SCHG was incepted earlier than VONG: SCHG (16 years) vs VONG (16 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than VONG (0.06). SCHG has a higher turnover VONG (10.00) vs VONG (10.00).
SCHGVONGSCHG / VONG
Gain YTD-6.537-5.729114%
Net Assets50.6B44.9B113%
Total Expense Ratio0.040.0667%
Turnover27.0010.00270%
Yield0.430.5185%
Fund Existence16 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SCHGVONG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SCHG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VONG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBRN34.100.31
+0.92%
iShares Neuroscience and Healthcare ETF
PQJA29.280.15
+0.51%
PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JANUARY
ESGG209.720.70
+0.33%
FlexShares STOXX Glbl ESG Select ETF
EAGG47.650.03
+0.06%
iShares ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
IBD23.93N/A
+0.02%
Inspire Corporate Bond ETF

SCHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCHG
1D Price
Change %
SCHG100%
+0.33%
NVDA - SCHG
83%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
AMZN - SCHG
75%
Closely correlated
+5.60%
IBKR - SCHG
74%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
AVGO - SCHG
73%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
AAPL - SCHG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
More

VONG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VONG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VONG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VONG
1D Price
Change %
VONG100%
+0.53%
NVDA - VONG
84%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
MS - VONG
76%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
GS - VONG
75%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
AVGO - VONG
75%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
AMZN - VONG
74%
Closely correlated
+5.60%
More