Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
SCHM vs VFMV
SCHM vs VFMV Comparison
Open Charts SCHM vs VFMV
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$29.79
Change-$0.10 (-0.33%)
Volume$1.14M
CapitalizationN/A
Vanguard US Minimum Volatility ETF
Price$127.27
Change-$0.26 (-0.20%)
Volume$2.83K
CapitalizationN/A
SCHM vs VFMV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SCHM vs. VFMV commentary
Dec 04, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SCHM is a Buy and VFMV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.1B vs. VFMV (153M). VFMV (22.091) and SCHM (21.494) have matching annual dividend yield . SCHM was incepted earlier than VFMV: SCHM (14 years) vs VFMV (7 years). VFMV has a higher turnover SCHM (18.00) vs SCHM (18.00).
| SCHM | VFMV | SCHM / VFMV | |
| Gain YTD | 21.494 | 22.091 | 97% |
| Net Assets | 12.1B | 153M | 7,908% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 26.00 | 69% |
| Yield | 1.42 | 1.74 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SCHM | VFMV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.11% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
More | ||||
VFMV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VFMV has been loosely correlated with CLBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VFMV jumps, then CLBK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VFMV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VFMV | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| CLBK - VFMV | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| BLFY - VFMV | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| MSGS - VFMV | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| GPOR - VFMV | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.74% | ||
| CCCS - VFMV | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||