It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SFBS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileVABK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SFBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VABK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SFBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.52% price change this week, while VABK (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.18%.
SFBS is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.
VABK is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2023.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
SFBS | VABK | SFBS / VABK | |
Capitalization | 3.57B | 162M | 2,206% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 40.268 | 24.221 | 166% |
P/E Ratio | 17.31 | 8.15 | 212% |
Revenue | 427M | 63.1M | 677% |
Total Cash | 112M | 7.42M | 1,510% |
Total Debt | 64.7M | 53.3M | 121% |
SFBS | VABK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 9 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VABK's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that VABK’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.
SFBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as VABK (48) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to VABK’s over the last 12 months.
SFBS's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VABK (48) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VABK’s over the last 12 months.
SFBS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as VABK (48) in the null industry. This means that SFBS’s stock grew similarly to VABK’s over the last 12 months.
VABK's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SFBS (16) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that VABK’s stock grew similarly to SFBS’s over the last 12 months.
SFBS | VABK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 3 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago51% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago49% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago55% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago65% | 8 days ago62% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago57% | 2 days ago60% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago60% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFBS has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFBS jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SFBS | 100% | -2.29% | ||
UBSI - SFBS | 87% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
FBK - SFBS | 87% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
WSFS - SFBS | 86% Closely correlated | -2.81% | ||
ABCB - SFBS | 86% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
SSB - SFBS | 85% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VABK has been loosely correlated with SMBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VABK jumps, then SMBK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VABK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
VABK | 100% | -0.63% | ||
SMBK - VABK | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
MOFG - VABK | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
MBCN - VABK | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
MCBS - VABK | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
SFBS - VABK | 55% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
More |