SGLMF
Price
$0.35
Change
-$0.01 (-2.78%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
STKAF
Price
$3.17
Change
-$0.05 (-1.55%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Ad is loading...

SGLMF vs STKAF

Header iconSGLMF vs STKAF Comparison
Open Charts SGLMF vs STKAFBanner chart's image
Starhill Global Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$0.35
Change-$0.01 (-2.78%)
Volume$16.96K
CapitalizationN/A
Stockland
Price$3.17
Change-$0.05 (-1.55%)
Volume$996
CapitalizationN/A
SGLMF vs STKAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SGLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STKAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGLMF vs. STKAF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGLMF is a Hold and STKAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (SGLMF: $0.35 vs. STKAF: $3.17)
Brand notoriety: SGLMF and STKAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGLMF: 106% vs. STKAF: 146%
Market capitalization -- SGLMF: $819.94M vs. STKAF: $6.77B
SGLMF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $819.94M. STKAF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $6.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGLMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTKAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SGLMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STKAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SGLMF and STKAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGLMF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STKAF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGLMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • STKAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SGLMF is a better buy in the short-term than STKAF.

Price Growth

SGLMF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STKAF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.53% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STKAF($6.77B) has a higher market cap than SGLMF($820M). SGLMF has higher P/E ratio than STKAF: SGLMF (33.90) vs STKAF (10.95). SGLMF YTD gains are higher at: -2.529 vs. STKAF (-3.939). STKAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.04B vs. SGLMF (69.7M). STKAF has more cash in the bank: 378M vs. SGLMF (62.7M). SGLMF has less debt than STKAF: SGLMF (1.05B) vs STKAF (4.47B). STKAF has higher revenues than SGLMF: STKAF (2.77B) vs SGLMF (188M).
SGLMFSTKAFSGLMF / STKAF
Capitalization820M6.77B12%
EBITDA69.7M1.04B7%
Gain YTD-2.529-3.93964%
P/E Ratio33.9010.95309%
Revenue188M2.77B7%
Total Cash62.7M378M17%
Total Debt1.05B4.47B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGLMF vs STKAF: Fundamental Ratings
SGLMF
STKAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3290
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9193
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6777
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGLMF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is in the same range as STKAF (39). This means that SGLMF’s stock grew similarly to STKAF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STKAF (100). This means that SGLMF’s stock grew similarly to STKAF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLMF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as STKAF (93). This means that SGLMF’s stock grew similarly to STKAF’s over the last 12 months.

STKAF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SGLMF (59). This means that STKAF’s stock grew similarly to SGLMF’s over the last 12 months.

SGLMF's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as STKAF (77). This means that SGLMF’s stock grew similarly to STKAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGLMFSTKAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SGLMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STKAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTCCX23.33N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Content & Connect C
GEIYX17.03N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds Growth Equity Idx Instl
PAEEX22.54-0.10
-0.44%
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr R6
IARAX17.33-0.08
-0.46%
Invesco Real Estate A
PRDGX76.55-1.95
-2.48%
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth

SGLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGLMF and CHCT have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGLMF and CHCT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGLMF
1D Price
Change %
SGLMF100%
N/A
CHCT - SGLMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
LAND - SGLMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.84%
WDPSF - SGLMF
16%
Poorly correlated
+27.46%
SRRTF - SGLMF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.44%
STKAF - SGLMF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STKAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STKAF has been loosely correlated with INGEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STKAF jumps, then INGEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STKAF
1D Price
Change %
STKAF100%
N/A
INGEF - STKAF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FRZCF - STKAF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MAPGF - STKAF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NTSGF - STKAF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
WDPSF - STKAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+27.46%
More