SGNLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Capitalization
41.39M
STPGF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
61.14M
Ad is loading...

SGNLF vs STPGF

Header iconSGNLF vs STPGF Comparison
Open Charts SGNLF vs STPGFBanner chart's image
SIGNAL GOLD
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$39K
Capitalization41.39M
Steppe Gold
Price$0.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.42K
Capitalization61.14M
SGNLF vs STPGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SGNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGNLF vs. STPGF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGNLF is a Hold and STPGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (SGNLF: $0.06 vs. STPGF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: SGNLF and STPGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGNLF: 127% vs. STPGF: 10%
Market capitalization -- SGNLF: $41.39M vs. STPGF: $61.14M
SGNLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $41.39M. STPGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $61.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGNLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTPGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SGNLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STPGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SGNLF and STPGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGNLF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STPGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGNLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • STPGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STPGF is a better buy in the short-term than SGNLF.

Price Growth

SGNLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STPGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STPGF($61.1M) has a higher market cap than SGNLF($41.4M). STPGF YTD gains are higher at: 0.035 vs. SGNLF (0.000). STPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30M vs. SGNLF (4.64M). SGNLF has more cash in the bank: 16.2M vs. STPGF (2.07M). STPGF has less debt than SGNLF: STPGF (12.2M) vs SGNLF (20.7M). STPGF has higher revenues than SGNLF: STPGF (66.4M) vs SGNLF (41.6M).
SGNLFSTPGFSGNLF / STPGF
Capitalization41.4M61.1M68%
EBITDA4.64M30M15%
Gain YTD0.0000.035-
P/E RatioN/A1.90-
Revenue41.6M66.4M63%
Total Cash16.2M2.07M783%
Total Debt20.7M12.2M170%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGNLF vs STPGF: Fundamental Ratings
SGNLF
STPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9488
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5680
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10061
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SGNLF's Valuation (39) in the null industry is in the same range as STPGF (50). This means that SGNLF’s stock grew similarly to STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

SGNLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as STPGF (100). This means that SGNLF’s stock grew similarly to STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as SGNLF (94). This means that STPGF’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SGNLF's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as STPGF (80). This means that SGNLF’s stock grew similarly to STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGNLF (100). This means that STPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGNLFSTPGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SGNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LSGR39.310.52
+1.33%
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
LCTU65.330.60
+0.93%
BlackRock US Carbon Transition Rdnss ETF
AVMA59.120.24
+0.41%
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
VNQ89.65-0.06
-0.07%
Vanguard Real Estate ETF
HERO23.82-0.17
-0.71%
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF

SGNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGNLF and NEM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGNLF and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGNLF
1D Price
Change %
SGNLF100%
N/A
NEM - SGNLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
FTBYF - SGNLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SVM - SGNLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
GOLD - SGNLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
STPGF - SGNLF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STPGF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STPGF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STPGF
1D Price
Change %
STPGF100%
N/A
HMY - STPGF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.28%
PAAS - STPGF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
NEM - STPGF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
AEM - STPGF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
AGI - STPGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More