SGNLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
SVM
Price
$2.88
Change
-$0.19 (-6.19%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
49 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SGNLF vs SVM

Header iconSGNLF vs SVM Comparison
Open Charts SGNLF vs SVMBanner chart's image
SIGNAL GOLD
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$39K
CapitalizationN/A
Silvercorp Metals
Price$2.88
Change-$0.19 (-6.19%)
Volume$3.36M
CapitalizationN/A
SGNLF vs SVM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SGNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SGNLF vs. SVM commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SGNLF is a Buy and SVM is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (SGNLF: $0.06 vs. SVM: $2.88)
Brand notoriety: SGNLF and SVM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SGNLF: 82% vs. SVM: 91%
Market capitalization -- SGNLF: $41.39M vs. SVM: $609.81M
SGNLF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $41.39M. SVM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $609.81M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SGNLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SGNLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SGNLF and SVM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SGNLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SGNLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SGNLF and SVM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SGNLF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.69% price change this week, while SVM (@Precious Metals) price change was -12.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVM is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SVM($610M) has a higher market cap than SGNLF($41.4M). SVM YTD gains are higher at: 10.289 vs. SGNLF (-39.512). SVM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 90M vs. SGNLF (4.64M). SVM has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. SGNLF (16.2M). SVM has less debt than SGNLF: SVM (398K) vs SGNLF (20.7M). SVM has higher revenues than SGNLF: SVM (207M) vs SGNLF (41.6M).
SGNLFSVMSGNLF / SVM
Capitalization41.4M610M7%
EBITDA4.64M90M5%
Gain YTD-39.51210.289-384%
P/E RatioN/A20.29-
Revenue41.6M207M20%
Total Cash16.2M198M8%
Total Debt20.7M398K5,201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SGNLF vs SVM: Fundamental Ratings
SGNLF
SVM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1554
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9371
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10084
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SVM's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (40) in the null industry. This means that SVM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SVM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (100) in the null industry. This means that SVM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SVM's SMR Rating (71) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (93) in the null industry. This means that SVM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

SGNLF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SVM (64) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SGNLF’s stock grew similarly to SVM’s over the last 12 months.

SVM's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SGNLF (100) in the null industry. This means that SVM’s stock grew similarly to SGNLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGNLFSVM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SGNLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPS62.93-0.24
-0.38%
WisdomTree US Earnings 500 ETF
RAAX28.28-0.63
-2.19%
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF
SPYV51.29-1.25
-2.38%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
MFDX29.56-0.78
-2.56%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Multi-Factor Intl Eq ETF
CRAK28.68-0.79
-2.69%
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

SGNLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SGNLF and NEM have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGNLF and NEM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SGNLF
1D Price
Change %
SGNLF100%
N/A
NEM - SGNLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.43%
FTBYF - SGNLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.90%
STPGF - SGNLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
SVM - SGNLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.19%
KDKGF - SGNLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-11.11%
More