In the rapidly evolving semiconductor landscape, fueled by artificial intelligence (AI), data centers, and digital transformation, investors seek precise exposure to this high-growth sector. SHOC and SOXX both target U.S.-listed semiconductor equities, offering alternatives for those aiming to capture sector upside. While they overlap significantly in holdings like NVDA, AMD, and INTC, differences in indexing, costs, concentration, and liquidity make them suitable for distinct strategies—SHOC for governance-focused concentration, SOXX for cost-efficient breadth. This ETF comparison highlights structural variances to aid sector allocation decisions in today's tech-driven market.
The Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC), issued by Strive Asset Management, is a passively managed fund launched in October 2022. It tracks the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Total Return Index, which selects the top 30 U.S.-listed semiconductor companies based on modified market capitalization adjusted for revenue exposure to the sector. Weights are capped to limit single-stock dominance, with rebalancing reflecting index methodology.
SHOC holds approximately 30–33 securities, with top holdings including NVDA (19.42%), AVGO (13.31%), INTC (8.28%), AMD (7.03%), and ASML (6.69%). The top 10 account for over 75% of assets, emphasizing mega-cap leaders. Sector allocation is nearly 100% technology, primarily semiconductors.
Its expense ratio is 0.40%, with AUM around $224 million. A distinguishing feature is Strive's focus on shareholder activism, including proxy voting and engagement with company boards to prioritize operational excellence and value creation.
The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX), managed by BlackRock's iShares, is a passive ETF inceptioned in July 2001. It replicates the NYSE Semiconductor Index, comprising 30 U.S.-listed firms in semiconductors and related equipment, weighted by modified market capitalization with caps to promote diversification.
Key holdings feature MU (9.77%), AMD (9.15%), INTC (7.39%), AVGO (7.26%), and NVDA (6.55%). The top 10 represent about 60% of the portfolio. Allocation is 100% technology, split between semiconductors (81%) and equipment (19%).
Expense ratio stands at 0.34%, with substantial AUM exceeding $33 billion, supporting tight bid-ask spreads (0.01% median). SOXX offers high liquidity, averaging over 6 million shares daily, making it ideal for institutional and retail traders seeking semiconductor purity.
The semiconductor sector powers AI acceleration, 5G rollout, electric vehicles, and cloud computing, with demand surging amid global digitization. Catalysts include hyperscaler capital expenditures on data centers and generative AI models, alongside U.S. CHIPS Act subsidies bolstering domestic manufacturing. Capital flows favor leaders in GPUs and advanced nodes, as seen in robust earnings from top holdings.
Macro drivers like stabilizing interest rates support capex cycles, while risks encompass supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Taiwan geopolitics), cyclical downturns, and U.S.-China trade tensions. Regulatory pushes for onshoring mitigate concentration risks, positioning both ETFs amid sector rotation toward tech amid broader equity rallies.
In recent market cycles, both ETFs have mirrored semiconductor momentum, driven by AI adoption and earnings beats from holdings like NVDA and AVGO. SHOC's heavier mega-cap tilt amplifies upside in growth phases but heightens volatility during rotations to value names.
SOXX, with balanced equipment exposure, exhibits relative stability across cycles, benefiting from foundry and fab tool demand. Over recent weeks and months, both have advanced amid sector tailwinds, though SOXX's liquidity aids execution in volatile swings. Divergences tie to weighting: SHOC outperforms in NVDA-led rallies, while SOXX edges in broader recoveries. Volatility profiles remain elevated, reflecting beta above 1.5 to broader markets.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Customizable filters span industries, market capitalization, technical indicators like RSI (Relative Strength Index) and moving averages, price patterns such as breakouts, and performance metrics including relative strength. This efficiency surpasses manual screening, uncovering trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and sector opportunities like semiconductors. Explore it today to refine your ETF comparison and identify high-conviction plays.
Tickeron’s AI currently favors SOXX due to its lower expense ratio, superior liquidity, established track record, and slightly broader diversification within semiconductors, enhancing risk-adjusted positioning amid volatile sector momentum. SHOC appeals for governance activism and concentration in high-momentum leaders, but SOXX's structural efficiencies yield a 65% probabilistic edge for most investors seeking durable exposure.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| SHOC | SOXX | SHOC / SOXX | |
| Gain YTD | 69.491 | 100.263 | 69% |
| Net Assets | 267M | 40.5B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.34 | 118% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 27.00 | 93% |
| Yield | 0.15 | 0.29 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 25 years | - |
| SHOC | SOXX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 78% | 19 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IYR | 101.79 | 1.79 | +1.79% |
| iShares US Real Estate ETF | |||
| IWMY | 19.75 | 0.27 | +1.41% |
| Defiance R2000 Target 30 Weekly Dis ETF | |||
| HELS | 24.80 | 0.21 | +0.86% |
| Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | |||
| JRI | 12.81 | 0.05 | +0.39% |
| NUVEEN REAL ASSET Income AND GROWTH FUND | |||
| RSMR | 23.37 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | -2.24% | ||
| LRCX - SHOC | 84% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 81% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| KLAC - SHOC | 80% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 78% Closely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| MPWR - SHOC | 75% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
More | ||||