SHOC
Price
$106.44
Change
-$9.81 (-8.44%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:55 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
267.45M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXX
Price
$539.91
Change
-$62.81 (-10.42%)
Updated
Jun 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
40.47B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SHOC vs SOXX

Header iconSHOC vs SOXX Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs SOXXBanner chart's image
SHOC vs SOXX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) vs. iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)

Key Takeaways

  • Both SHOC and SOXX deliver concentrated exposure to the U.S.-listed semiconductor sector but differ in index methodology: SHOC's Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index emphasizes revenue-adjusted market cap for the top 30 holdings, while SOXX's NYSE Semiconductor Index uses modified market-cap weighting across 30 names.
  • SHOC exhibits higher concentration risk with top 10 holdings comprising over 75%, led by NVDA (~19%) and AVGO (~13%), versus SOXX's more balanced top 10 at around 60%.
  • SOXX offers a cost advantage with a 0.34% expense ratio compared to SHOC's 0.40%, alongside superior liquidity from $33 billion in assets under management (AUM, total assets in the fund) and higher daily trading volume.
  • SHOC distinguishes itself through active corporate governance practices, including proxy voting and management engagement, aiming to enhance long-term value in holdings.
  • Both ETFs maintain 100% technology/semiconductor sector allocation, but SOXX includes broader semiconductor equipment exposure (19%), potentially reducing pure-play chipmaker volatility.
  • In recent market cycles, both have benefited from AI-driven demand, though SOXX's established track record since 2001 provides more historical diversification data.

Introduction

In the rapidly evolving semiconductor landscape, fueled by artificial intelligence (AI), data centers, and digital transformation, investors seek precise exposure to this high-growth sector. SHOC and SOXX both target U.S.-listed semiconductor equities, offering alternatives for those aiming to capture sector upside. While they overlap significantly in holdings like NVDA, AMD, and INTC, differences in indexing, costs, concentration, and liquidity make them suitable for distinct strategies—SHOC for governance-focused concentration, SOXX for cost-efficient breadth. This ETF comparison highlights structural variances to aid sector allocation decisions in today's tech-driven market.

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) Overview

The Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC), issued by Strive Asset Management, is a passively managed fund launched in October 2022. It tracks the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Total Return Index, which selects the top 30 U.S.-listed semiconductor companies based on modified market capitalization adjusted for revenue exposure to the sector. Weights are capped to limit single-stock dominance, with rebalancing reflecting index methodology.

SHOC holds approximately 30–33 securities, with top holdings including NVDA (19.42%), AVGO (13.31%), INTC (8.28%), AMD (7.03%), and ASML (6.69%). The top 10 account for over 75% of assets, emphasizing mega-cap leaders. Sector allocation is nearly 100% technology, primarily semiconductors.

Its expense ratio is 0.40%, with AUM around $224 million. A distinguishing feature is Strive's focus on shareholder activism, including proxy voting and engagement with company boards to prioritize operational excellence and value creation.

iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) Overview

The iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX), managed by BlackRock's iShares, is a passive ETF inceptioned in July 2001. It replicates the NYSE Semiconductor Index, comprising 30 U.S.-listed firms in semiconductors and related equipment, weighted by modified market capitalization with caps to promote diversification.

Key holdings feature MU (9.77%), AMD (9.15%), INTC (7.39%), AVGO (7.26%), and NVDA (6.55%). The top 10 represent about 60% of the portfolio. Allocation is 100% technology, split between semiconductors (81%) and equipment (19%).

Expense ratio stands at 0.34%, with substantial AUM exceeding $33 billion, supporting tight bid-ask spreads (0.01% median). SOXX offers high liquidity, averaging over 6 million shares daily, making it ideal for institutional and retail traders seeking semiconductor purity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor sector powers AI acceleration, 5G rollout, electric vehicles, and cloud computing, with demand surging amid global digitization. Catalysts include hyperscaler capital expenditures on data centers and generative AI models, alongside U.S. CHIPS Act subsidies bolstering domestic manufacturing. Capital flows favor leaders in GPUs and advanced nodes, as seen in robust earnings from top holdings.

Macro drivers like stabilizing interest rates support capex cycles, while risks encompass supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Taiwan geopolitics), cyclical downturns, and U.S.-China trade tensions. Regulatory pushes for onshoring mitigate concentration risks, positioning both ETFs amid sector rotation toward tech amid broader equity rallies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have mirrored semiconductor momentum, driven by AI adoption and earnings beats from holdings like NVDA and AVGO. SHOC's heavier mega-cap tilt amplifies upside in growth phases but heightens volatility during rotations to value names.

SOXX, with balanced equipment exposure, exhibits relative stability across cycles, benefiting from foundry and fab tool demand. Over recent weeks and months, both have advanced amid sector tailwinds, though SOXX's liquidity aids execution in volatile swings. Divergences tie to weighting: SHOC outperforms in NVDA-led rallies, while SOXX edges in broader recoveries. Volatility profiles remain elevated, reflecting beta above 1.5 to broader markets.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that empowers traders and investors to filter thousands of assets using technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Customizable filters span industries, market capitalization, technical indicators like RSI (Relative Strength Index) and moving averages, price patterns such as breakouts, and performance metrics including relative strength. This efficiency surpasses manual screening, uncovering trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and sector opportunities like semiconductors. Explore it today to refine your ETF comparison and identify high-conviction plays.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SOXX due to its lower expense ratio, superior liquidity, established track record, and slightly broader diversification within semiconductors, enhancing risk-adjusted positioning amid volatile sector momentum. SHOC appeals for governance activism and concentration in high-momentum leaders, but SOXX's structural efficiencies yield a 65% probabilistic edge for most investors seeking durable exposure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SHOC vs. SOXX commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and SOXX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOXX has more net assets: 40.5B vs. SHOC (267M). SOXX has a higher annual dividend yield than SHOC: SOXX (100.263) vs SHOC (69.491). SHOC was incepted earlier than SOXX: SHOC (4 years) vs SOXX (25 years). SOXX (0.34) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SOXX has a higher turnover SHOC (25.00) vs SHOC (25.00).
SHOCSOXXSHOC / SOXX
Gain YTD69.491100.26369%
Net Assets267M40.5B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.400.34118%
Turnover25.0027.0093%
Yield0.150.2951%
Fund Existence4 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SHOCSOXX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SHOC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYR101.791.79
+1.79%
iShares US Real Estate ETF
IWMY19.750.27
+1.41%
Defiance R2000 Target 30 Weekly Dis ETF
HELS24.800.21
+0.86%
Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF
JRI12.810.05
+0.39%
NUVEEN REAL ASSET Income AND GROWTH FUND
RSMR23.37N/A
N/A
FT Vest U.S. Equity Equal Weight Buffer ETF - March

SHOC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHOC
1D Price
Change %
SHOC100%
-2.24%
LRCX - SHOC
84%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
AMAT - SHOC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
KLAC - SHOC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
ASML - SHOC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
MPWR - SHOC
75%
Closely correlated
-2.21%
More