Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SHOC vs VGT
SHOC vs VGT Comparison
Open Charts SHOC vs VGT
SHOC vs VGT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SHOC vs. VGT commentary
Aug 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SHOC is a Hold and VGT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 161B vs. SHOC (233M). SHOC has a higher annual dividend yield than VGT: SHOC (52.798) vs VGT (25.767). SHOC was incepted earlier than VGT: SHOC (4 years) vs VGT (23 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than SHOC (0.40). SHOC has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) vs VGT (8.00).
| SHOC | VGT | SHOC / VGT | |
| Gain YTD | 52.798 | 25.767 | 205% |
| Net Assets | 233M | 161B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.09 | 444% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 8.00 | 313% |
| Yield | 0.14 | 0.38 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 23 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SHOC | VGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SHOC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOC has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOC jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOC | 100% | +0.68% | ||
| AMAT - SHOC | 85% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ASML - SHOC | 83% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| ENTG - SHOC | 79% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| SWKS - SHOC | 71% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
| ACLS - SHOC | 71% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
More | ||||
VGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VGT has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VGT jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VGT | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| LRCX - VGT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| ENTG - VGT | 71% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CEVA - VGT | 71% Closely correlated | -5.92% | ||
| AMD - VGT | 70% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| ONTO - VGT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||