SILS
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SIREF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SILS vs SIREF

Header iconSILS vs SIREF Comparison
Open Charts SILS vs SIREFBanner chart's image
Silver Scott Mines
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.9K
CapitalizationN/A
Sirios Resources
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization8.93M
SILS vs SIREF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SILS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SILS vs. SIREF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SILS is a Hold and SIREF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SILS: $0.16 vs. SIREF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: SILS and SIREF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SILS: 83% vs. SIREF: 1%
Market capitalization -- SILS: $0 vs. SIREF: $8.93M
SILS [@Precious Metals] is valued at $0. SIREF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SILS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIREF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SILS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SIREF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIREF is a better buy in the long-term than SILS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SILS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SIREF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SILS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SIREF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SIREF is a better buy in the short-term than SILS.

Price Growth

SILS (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while SIREF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SILS YTD gains are higher at: 698.000 vs. SIREF (40.857).
SILSSIREFSILS / SIREF
CapitalizationN/A8.93M-
EBITDAN/A-805.44K-
Gain YTD698.00040.8571,708%
P/E RatioN/A50.51-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A559K-
Total DebtN/A40K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SILS vs SIREF: Fundamental Ratings
SILS
SIREF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7187
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10090
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SIREF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SILS (90). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to SILS’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SILS (100). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to SILS’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SILS (100). This means that SIREF’s stock grew similarly to SILS’s over the last 12 months.

SILS's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SIREF (39). This means that SILS’s stock grew similarly to SIREF’s over the last 12 months.

SIREF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SILS (100). This means that SIREF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SILS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SILSSIREF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SILS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SIREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NGNE20.090.90
+4.69%
Neurogene
SPGI529.613.97
+0.76%
S&P Global
OMCL29.840.04
+0.13%
Omnicell
MOBX0.75N/A
+0.13%
Mobix Labs
FYBR36.50N/A
N/A
Frontier Communications Parent

SILS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SILS and AXDDF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SILS and AXDDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILS
1D Price
Change %
SILS100%
-0.13%
AXDDF - SILS
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.76%
MEXGF - SILS
21%
Poorly correlated
+22.79%
DCHRF - SILS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAKAF - SILS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBYSF - SILS
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SIREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIREF and SMDRF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIREF and SMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIREF
1D Price
Change %
SIREF100%
+1.65%
SMDRF - SIREF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.37%
ARRKF - SIREF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SDRC - SIREF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
SBYSF - SIREF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SILS - SIREF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
More