SLAMF
Price
$11.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
XITO
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Ad is loading...

SLAMF vs XITO

Header iconSLAMF vs XITO Comparison
Open Charts SLAMF vs XITOBanner chart's image
Slam
Price$11.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$125.05K
CapitalizationN/A
XENOUS
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$301
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
SLAMF vs XITO Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
SLAMF vs. XITO commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLAMF is a Sell and XITO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SLAMF: $11.16 vs. XITO: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: SLAMF and XITO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLAMF: 36% vs. XITO: 100%
Market capitalization -- SLAMF: $438.8M vs. XITO: $30.41M
SLAMF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $438.8M. XITO’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $30.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLAMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXITO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLAMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • XITO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SLAMF and XITO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

SLAMF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while XITO (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLAMF($439M) has a higher market cap than XITO($30.4M). SLAMF YTD gains are higher at: 2.857 vs. XITO (-11.940). XITO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -58.52K vs. SLAMF (-3.36M). SLAMF has more cash in the bank: 3.34K vs. XITO (0). XITO has less debt than SLAMF: XITO (748K) vs SLAMF (10.2M). SLAMF (0) and XITO (0) have equivalent revenues.
SLAMFXITOSLAMF / XITO
Capitalization439M30.4M1,444%
EBITDA-3.36M-58.52K5,749%
Gain YTD2.857-11.940-24%
P/E Ratio65.00N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.34K0-
Total Debt10.2M748K1,364%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
XITO: Fundamental Ratings
XITO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

SLAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLAMF has been loosely correlated with KACL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLAMF jumps, then KACL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLAMF
1D Price
Change %
SLAMF100%
N/A
KACL - SLAMF
39%
Loosely correlated
-6.90%
NVAC - SLAMF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MNTN - SLAMF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RCFA - SLAMF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PPYA - SLAMF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

XITO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XITO and ADMG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XITO and ADMG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XITO
1D Price
Change %
XITO100%
N/A
ADMG - XITO
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWUP - XITO
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
SLAMF - XITO
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSTC - XITO
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - XITO
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More