SLB
Price
$54.87
Change
-$3.14 (-5.41%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
82.03B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WHD
Price
$56.62
Change
-$2.26 (-3.84%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
3.93B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLB vs WHD

Header iconSLB vs WHD Comparison
Open Charts SLB vs WHDBanner chart's image
SLB vs WHD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? SLB N.V. (SLB) vs. Cactus, Inc. (WHD) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • SLB N.V. (SLB) boasts significantly stronger year-to-date (YTD) gains of approximately 47%, outpacing Cactus, Inc. (WHD)'s 25% rise, reflecting robust momentum in recent market activity.
  • Both stocks operate in the oil and gas equipment and services sector, but SLB's $84 billion market cap dwarfs WHD's $3.9 billion, offering greater scale and diversification.
  • Recent SLB quarterly earnings slightly exceeded expectations, driven by digital growth and acquisitions, though Middle East tensions introduced volatility.
  • WHD maintains steady performance with an upcoming earnings report, supported by a higher dividend yield relative to its peers in recent weeks.
  • SLB exhibits lower volatility with a beta of 0.69 compared to WHD's 1.32, appealing to stability-focused investors.
  • Analyst targets suggest moderate upside for both, with SLB at around $56 and WHD at $58 on average.

Introduction

In the volatile energy sector, oil and gas equipment providers like SLB N.V. (SLB) and Cactus, Inc. (WHD) offer distinct opportunities for traders and investors navigating geopolitical tensions and fluctuating commodity prices. This stock comparison evaluates their recent performance, business models, and market positioning amid broader oilfield services trends. Energy sector enthusiasts, growth-oriented traders, and dividend seekers may find value in understanding their relative strengths, especially as global demand shifts influence sentiment and price behavior in recent market activity. By examining key metrics and developments, investors can assess trade-offs in scale, stability, and momentum for informed portfolio decisions.

SLB Overview and Recent Performance

SLB N.V. (SLB), a global leader in energy technology and services, operates across digital integration, reservoir performance, and production systems. With a market capitalization exceeding $84 billion, it serves major oilfields worldwide. In recent weeks, SLB stock has shown resilience, posting strong YTD gains of about 47% and trading near its 52-week high of $57. Quarterly earnings recently beat expectations on adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $0.52 and revenue of $8.72 billion, bolstered by digital advancements and the ChampionX acquisition. However, Middle East disruptions, including Iran-related conflicts, have pressured operations and logistics costs, contributing to short-term price wavers. Lower beta (0.69) underscores relative stability, while a 2.16% dividend yield supports investor sentiment amid sector recovery.

WHD Overview and Recent Performance

Cactus, Inc. (WHD) specializes in wellhead and pressure control equipment for onshore and offshore markets, primarily in North America. Its $3.9 billion market cap positions it as a mid-tier player in oil and gas equipment services. Recent market activity has seen WHD deliver solid YTD performance of roughly 25%, with shares hovering around $57 near the 52-week high of $59. Trading volume remains moderate, and a PE ratio (price-to-earnings) of 23.56 aligns with peers. With earnings approaching, focus lies on quarterly revenue stability. A beta of 1.32 indicates higher sensitivity to market swings, while a 1.01% dividend yield provides income appeal. Sentiment stays positive per analyst updates, though lacking major headlines in recent weeks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 elite AI-powered trading bots curated from over 351 available agents that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, multi-agent systems, and take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL), with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Top performers boast annualized returns up to +170%, win rates ranging 48%–88%, profit factors of 1.5–11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in some cases. Selected for current market conditions, they excel in volatile sectors via real-time AI signals. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

SLB N.V. (SLB) and Cactus, Inc. (WHD) both thrive in oil and gas equipment services, but SLB’s global footprint and diversified segments (digital, reservoir) contrast WHD’s focus on wellhead solutions. Growth drivers for SLB include AI partnerships and acquisitions, while WHD leverages U.S. onshore demand. Recent momentum favors SLB with superior YTD returns, though geopolitical risks elevate its exposure versus WHD’s regional stability. SLB’s lower beta signals less volatility, but WHD offers growth potential in a concentrated model. Market sentiment leans positive for both, with analysts citing upside amid energy transitions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI tools, analyzing trend consistency and relative positioning, would currently favor SLB over WHD. SLB’s stronger YTD momentum, earnings resilience despite headwinds, larger scale, and lower beta suggest higher probability of sustained outperformance in the near term, particularly if oilfield activity rebounds. WHD remains competitive for niche exposure, but SLB edges ahead on observable catalysts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SLB vs. WHD commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLB is a Hold and WHD is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2026
Stock price -- (SLB: $54.87 vs. WHD: $56.62)
Brand notoriety: SLB: Notable vs. WHD: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLB: 76% vs. WHD: 81%
Market capitalization -- SLB: $82.03B vs. WHD: $3.93B
SLB [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $82.03B. WHD’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $3.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $82.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $6.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLB’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWHD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WHD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLB is a better buy in the long-term than WHD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WHD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLB is a better buy in the short-term than WHD.

Price Growth

SLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +1.11% price change this week, while WHD (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -2.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +8.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +89.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLB is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2026.

WHD is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+8.95% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLB($82B) has a higher market cap than WHD($3.93B). WHD has higher P/E ratio than SLB: WHD (52.92) vs SLB (24.17). SLB YTD gains are higher at: 44.562 vs. WHD (24.572). SLB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.87B vs. WHD (329M). WHD has less debt than SLB: WHD (55.2M) vs SLB (11.6B). SLB has higher revenues than WHD: SLB (35.9B) vs WHD (1.19B).
SLBWHDSLB / WHD
Capitalization82B3.93B2,087%
EBITDA6.87B329M2,087%
Gain YTD44.56224.572181%
P/E Ratio24.1752.9246%
Revenue35.9B1.19B3,024%
Total Cash2.82BN/A-
Total Debt11.6B55.2M21,014%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLB vs WHD: Fundamental Ratings
SLB
WHD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7580
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4760
SMR RATING
1..100
5962
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5011

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLB's Valuation (27) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as WHD (41). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to WHD’s over the last 12 months.

SLB's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as WHD (60). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to WHD’s over the last 12 months.

SLB's SMR Rating (59) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as WHD (62). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to WHD’s over the last 12 months.

SLB's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as WHD (42). This means that SLB’s stock grew similarly to WHD’s over the last 12 months.

WHD's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as SLB (9). This means that WHD’s stock grew similarly to SLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLBWHD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XHYC36.80N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US HY Cnsmr Cyclcls Sctr ETF
PCFI22.33-0.06
-0.29%
POLEN FLOATING RATE INCOME ETF
REM21.68-0.15
-0.69%
iShares Mortgage Real Estate Capped ETF
EOCT33.48-0.61
-1.78%
Innovator Emerg Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF™-Oct
SGOL41.12-1.54
-3.61%
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF

WHD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHD has been loosely correlated with INVX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHD jumps, then INVX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHD
1D Price
Change %
WHD100%
-3.84%
INVX - WHD
65%
Loosely correlated
-5.44%
NOV - WHD
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.11%
WFRD - WHD
60%
Loosely correlated
-6.32%
SLB - WHD
59%
Loosely correlated
-5.41%
TTI - WHD
57%
Loosely correlated
-6.45%
More