SLVTF
Price
$0.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
57.79M
WPM
Price
$91.73
Change
-$0.10 (-0.11%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.35B
65 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SLVTF vs WPM

Header iconSLVTF vs WPM Comparison
Open Charts SLVTF vs WPMBanner chart's image
Silver Tiger Metals
Price$0.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$494.87K
Capitalization57.79M
Wheaton Precious Metals
Price$91.73
Change-$0.10 (-0.11%)
Volume$15.14K
Capitalization21.35B
SLVTF vs WPM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SLVTF vs. WPM commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLVTF is a Buy and WPM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (SLVTF: $0.27 vs. WPM: $91.83)
Brand notoriety: SLVTF: Not notable vs. WPM: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SLVTF: 149% vs. WPM: 127%
Market capitalization -- SLVTF: $57.79M vs. WPM: $21.35B
SLVTF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $57.79M. WPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $21.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SLVTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWPM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SLVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SLVTF and WPM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVTF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WPM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SLVTF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLVTF is a better buy in the short-term than WPM.

Price Growth

SLVTF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +14.16% price change this week, while WPM (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

WPM is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.90% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WPM($21.3B) has a higher market cap than SLVTF($57.8M). SLVTF YTD gains are higher at: 67.506 vs. WPM (63.946). WPM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 755M vs. SLVTF (-4.4M). WPM has more cash in the bank: 547M vs. SLVTF (18.4M). SLVTF has less debt than WPM: SLVTF (33.5K) vs WPM (6.23M). WPM has higher revenues than SLVTF: WPM (1.02B) vs SLVTF (0).
SLVTFWPMSLVTF / WPM
Capitalization57.8M21.3B0%
EBITDA-4.4M755M-1%
Gain YTD67.50663.946106%
P/E RatioN/A40.30-
Revenue01.02B-
Total Cash18.4M547M3%
Total Debt33.5K6.23M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLVTF vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
SLVTF
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1912
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6617
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLVTF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (57) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLVTF (66) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLVTF’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's SMR Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SLVTF (100) in the null industry. This means that WPM’s stock grew similarly to SLVTF’s over the last 12 months.

SLVTF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

SLVTF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WPM (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SLVTF’s stock grew similarly to WPM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVTFWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SLVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WPM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FULC6.960.09
+1.24%
Fulcrum Therapeutics
RACE480.081.32
+0.28%
Ferrari NV
RBOT7.53-0.01
-0.13%
Vicarious Surgical
ARCO7.39-0.02
-0.27%
Arcos Dorados Holdings
STWD19.60-0.15
-0.76%
Starwood Property Trust

SLVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVTF has been loosely correlated with GLGDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLVTF jumps, then GLGDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVTF
1D Price
Change %
SLVTF100%
+0.35%
GLGDF - SLVTF
44%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
MAG - SLVTF
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.33%
AYASF - SLVTF
42%
Loosely correlated
+7.30%
HL - SLVTF
41%
Loosely correlated
+9.53%
WPM - SLVTF
40%
Loosely correlated
+5.86%
More

WPM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WPM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WPM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WPM
1D Price
Change %
WPM100%
+5.86%
AEM - WPM
92%
Closely correlated
+5.33%
RGLD - WPM
87%
Closely correlated
+4.82%
AGI - WPM
85%
Closely correlated
+5.64%
FNV - WPM
85%
Closely correlated
+5.55%
KGC - WPM
81%
Closely correlated
+6.51%
More