SLYG vs VRTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SLYG is a Buy and VRTS is a StrongBuy.
VRTS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SLYG | VRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 5 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 69% |
SLYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLYG has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLYG jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SLYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLYG | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| PIPR - SLYG | 84% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| KN - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| ENVA - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| MC - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| TPH - SLYG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
More | ||||
VRTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been closely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRTS | 100% | -0.76% | ||
| APAM - VRTS | 75% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| IVZ - VRTS | 75% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| TROW - VRTS | 72% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| AMG - VRTS | 72% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| STT - VRTS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||