SMBK
Price
$32.03
Change
-$1.36 (-4.07%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:28 PM (EDT)
40 days until earnings call
WASH
Price
$30.91
Change
-$3.02 (-8.90%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SMBK vs WASH

Header iconSMBK vs WASH Comparison
Open Charts SMBK vs WASHBanner chart's image
SmartFinancial
Price$32.03
Change-$1.36 (-4.07%)
Volume$213
CapitalizationN/A
Washington Trust Ban
Price$30.91
Change-$3.02 (-8.90%)
Volume$17.19K
CapitalizationN/A
SMBK vs WASH Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMBK vs. WASH commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMBK is a Hold and WASH is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (SMBK: $33.39 vs. WASH: $33.93)
Brand notoriety: SMBK and WASH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMBK: 66% vs. WASH: 173%
Market capitalization -- SMBK: $347.08M vs. WASH: $448.06M
SMBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $347.08M. WASH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $448.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMBK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWASH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SMBK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WASH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMBK is a better buy in the long-term than WASH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMBK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WASH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WASH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMBK is a better buy in the short-term than WASH.

Price Growth

SMBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.03% price change this week, while WASH (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

WASH is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WASH($448M) has a higher market cap than SMBK($347M). SMBK has higher P/E ratio than WASH: SMBK (12.09) vs WASH (9.33). SMBK YTD gains are higher at: 38.015 vs. WASH (11.131). SMBK has less debt than WASH: SMBK (50.1M) vs WASH (1.25B). WASH has higher revenues than SMBK: WASH (193M) vs SMBK (152M).
SMBKWASHSMBK / WASH
Capitalization347M448M77%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.01511.131342%
P/E Ratio12.099.33130%
Revenue152M193M79%
Total Cash63MN/A-
Total Debt50.1M1.25B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMBK vs WASH: Fundamental Ratings
SMBK
WASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29100
SMR RATING
1..100
2827
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4248
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1923
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMBK's Valuation (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (63). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for WASH (100). This means that SMBK’s stock grew significantly faster than WASH’s over the last 12 months.

WASH's SMR Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SMBK (28). This means that WASH’s stock grew similarly to SMBK’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (48). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

SMBK's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WASH (23). This means that SMBK’s stock grew similarly to WASH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMBKWASH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WASH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MBIRX53.560.17
+0.32%
Morgan Stanley Insight IR
IVRTX29.18-0.11
-0.38%
VY® CBRE Real Estate S2
RYLVX105.07-1.20
-1.13%
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value A
DNVYX27.48-0.32
-1.15%
Davis NY Venture Y
FSKGX19.97-0.24
-1.19%
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6

SMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBK has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBK jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBK
1D Price
Change %
SMBK100%
-1.53%
FMBH - SMBK
83%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
SHBI - SMBK
83%
Closely correlated
-1.46%
OCFC - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
-3.74%
BUSE - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
-2.35%
WASH - SMBK
82%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
More