Ad is loading...
SMCFX vs TESGX
SMCFX vs TESGX Comparison
Open Charts SMCFX vs TESGX
American Funds SMALLCAP World F2
Price$67.61
Change+$1.34 (+2.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.33B
Templeton Global Smaller Comp C
Price$8.26
Change+$0.18 (+2.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets762.32M
SMCFX vs TESGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMCFX vs. TESGX commentary
May 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMCFX is a Buy and TESGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCFX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. TESGX (762M). SMCFX pays higher dividends than TESGX: SMCFX (0.90) vs TESGX (0.46). SMCFX was incepted earlier than TESGX: SMCFX (17 years) vs TESGX (30 years). TESGX (2.06) is less costly to investors than SMCFX (0.76). SMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. TESGX (11.95). SMCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TESGX: SMCFX (250) vs TESGX (1000). SMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.31 vs. TESGX (-4.33). SMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.44 vs. TESGX (20.71).
| SMCFX | TESGX | SMCFX / TESGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 2.06 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 2.06 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.523 | -5.708 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.3B | 762M | 9,357% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.46 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.31 | -4.33 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.85 | -2.27 | -390% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.44 | 20.71 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.68 | -4.34 | -937% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers