Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMCMX vs VBIPX
SMCMX vs VBIPX Comparison
Open Charts SMCMX vs VBIPX
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond C
Price$10.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets620.27M
Vanguard Short-Term Bond Idx InstlPls
Price$10.23
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets64.42B
SMCMX vs VBIPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMCMX vs. VBIPX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMCMX is a Hold and VBIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VBIPX has more cash in the bank: 64.4B vs. SMCMX (620M). VBIPX pays higher dividends than SMCMX: VBIPX (3.63) vs SMCMX (3.33). SMCMX was incepted earlier than VBIPX: SMCMX (7 years) vs VBIPX (14 years). SMCMX (1.53) is less costly to investors than VBIPX (0.03). SMCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 157.00 vs. VBIPX (56.00). SMCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than VBIPX: SMCMX (2500) vs VBIPX (100000000). SMCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. VBIPX (2.40). SMCMX return over 5 years is better than : 6.15 vs. VBIPX (-5.57).
| SMCMX | VBIPX | SMCMX / VBIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.03 | 4,967% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.03 | 5,100% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.876 | 1.086 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 620M | 64.4B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.33 | 3.63 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.73 | 2.40 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.07 | 1.24 | 733% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.15 | -5.57 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement