Ad is loading...
SMH vs TRFM
SMH vs TRFM Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TRFM
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$222.02
Change+$2.00 (+0.91%)
Volume$94.78K
Net Assets19.96B
AAM Transformers ETF
Price$37.44
Change+$0.86 (+2.35%)
Volume$200
Net Assets53.97M
SMH vs TRFM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TRFM commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and TRFM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 20B vs. TRFM (54M). TRFM has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: TRFM (-3.631) vs SMH (-8.350). SMH was incepted earlier than TRFM: SMH (13 years) vs TRFM (3 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TRFM (0.49). TRFM has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| SMH | TRFM | SMH / TRFM | |
| Gain YTD | -8.350 | -3.631 | 230% |
| Net Assets | 20B | 54M | 37,037% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.49 | 71% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 84.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 0.51 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TRFM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TRFM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRFM has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TRFM jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRFM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRFM | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| APH - TRFM | 79% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| ARM - TRFM | 75% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| GEV - TRFM | 72% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| TSEM - TRFM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| CLS - TRFM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||