Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs WCLD
SMH vs WCLD Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs WCLD
SMH vs WCLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+42%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. WCLD commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a StrongBuy and WCLD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 67.7B vs. WCLD (281M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than WCLD: SMH (59.862) vs WCLD (8.426). SMH was incepted earlier than WCLD: SMH (15 years) vs WCLD (7 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than WCLD (0.45). WCLD has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| SMH | WCLD | SMH / WCLD | |
| Gain YTD | 59.862 | 8.426 | 710% |
| Net Assets | 67.7B | 281M | 24,093% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.45 | 78% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 39.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | WCLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+42%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +5.55% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +7.85% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +6.95% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +5.48% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | +4.22% | ||
| MU - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +7.62% | ||
More | ||||
WCLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WCLD has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WCLD jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WCLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCLD | 100% | +3.77% | ||
| FRSH - WCLD | 80% Closely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| TEAM - WCLD | 79% Closely correlated | +6.36% | ||
| DOCU - WCLD | 78% Closely correlated | +4.37% | ||
| WDAY - WCLD | 78% Closely correlated | +3.77% | ||
| OKTA - WCLD | 77% Closely correlated | +4.41% | ||
More | ||||