SMH
Price
$560.42
Change
-$2.23 (-0.40%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
66.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XNTK
Price
$357.31
Change
-$0.28 (-0.08%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Net Assets
1.98B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMH vs XNTK

SMH vs XNTK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) vs. SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK)

Key Takeaways

  • SMH provides concentrated exposure to the semiconductor industry through a market-cap-weighted index of approximately 25 U.S.-listed companies, while XNTK offers broader technology sector exposure via an equal-weighted index of 35 companies.
  • Both ETFs maintain identical expense ratios of 0.35%, making cost structures comparable for long-term investors.
  • SMH exhibits higher concentration risk due to its narrow focus and top-heavy weighting, whereas XNTK delivers more balanced diversification across technology subsectors.
  • SMH targets pure-play semiconductor producers and equipment makers, positioning it for cycles driven by chip demand, while XNTK captures a wider array of technology firms including hardware, software, and services.
  • Structural differences in index methodology—market-cap weighting in SMH versus equal weighting in XNTK—influence relative performance during sector rotations and earnings seasons.
  • Both funds operate as passive, non-leveraged vehicles suited for investors seeking technology-themed equity exposure without active management overlays.

Introduction

Investors evaluating technology-themed exchange-traded funds (ETFs) often compare specialized semiconductor vehicles with broader technology benchmarks. The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and the SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) represent distinct approaches within the same overarching sector. SMH delivers targeted exposure to semiconductor companies, while XNTK provides diversified access across multiple technology sub-industries. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative tools depending on an investor’s conviction in chip-specific growth versus broader tech trends. The comparison highlights differences in concentration, weighting methodology, and thematic precision that matter for portfolio construction in evolving market environments.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. This market-cap-weighted index includes approximately 25 of the largest U.S.-listed companies engaged in semiconductor production and equipment manufacturing. The fund typically holds around 26 securities and maintains a 100% allocation to the technology sector, with particular emphasis on semiconductors. Top holdings often account for over 70% of assets, led by major chip designers and manufacturers. SMH employs a passive strategy with no active management component and features an expense ratio of 0.35%. Its distinguishing characteristic is the narrow, industry-specific mandate that captures semiconductor supply-chain dynamics without dilution from adjacent technology areas.

SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) Overview

The SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) tracks the NYSE Technology Index, which comprises 35 leading U.S.-listed technology-related companies. The fund utilizes an equal-weighted methodology, providing balanced exposure across its holdings rather than concentrating assets in the largest constituents. XNTK maintains approximately 35 securities and spans a wider technology universe that includes hardware, software, semiconductors, and related services. Its expense ratio stands at 0.35%, matching that of SMH. As a passive vehicle, XNTK rebalances periodically to maintain equal weights, which can introduce different performance characteristics during periods of varying stock leadership within the technology sector.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from structural demand drivers including artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout, data center expansion, and ongoing digital transformation across industries. Semiconductor supply chains remain sensitive to geopolitical tensions, export controls, and capacity investments, while broader technology firms face varying impacts from interest rate environments and corporate spending cycles. Capital flows into technology have shown resilience in recent market cycles, supported by earnings growth in key subsectors. Regulatory developments around export restrictions and competition policy add layers of complexity for both semiconductor-focused and diversified technology portfolios. These macro and thematic factors create an environment where concentrated industry bets and broader sector allocations each carry distinct risk-return profiles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent weeks and months, relative performance between the two ETFs has reflected differences in concentration and weighting. SMH’s market-cap weighting amplifies moves in its largest semiconductor holdings during earnings-driven rallies or pullbacks. XNTK’s equal-weighted approach can moderate volatility by distributing exposure more evenly, potentially leading to different behavior during rotations within technology. Both ETFs respond to broader sector momentum, interest rate expectations, and capital expenditure trends in technology infrastructure. SMH tends to exhibit higher sensitivity to semiconductor-specific catalysts, while XNTK captures a more diversified set of technology earnings outcomes. Investors monitoring relative positioning often consider these structural traits when assessing how each fund may respond to shifts in market leadership.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) for investors with high conviction in semiconductor leadership, citing its targeted exposure and established liquidity profile. For those seeking broader diversification within technology, the SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) presents a lower-concentration alternative with comparable costs. The assessment rests on observable factors including index construction, sector focus, and risk concentration rather than short-term price movements.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SMH vs. XNTK commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and XNTK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 66.8B vs. XNTK (1.98B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than XNTK: SMH (55.616) vs XNTK (28.698). SMH was incepted earlier than XNTK: SMH (15 years) vs XNTK (26 years). SMH (0.35) and XNTK (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . XNTK has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
SMHXNTKSMH / XNTK
Gain YTD55.61628.698194%
Net Assets66.8B1.98B3,370%
Total Expense Ratio0.350.35100%
Turnover12.0016.0075%
Yield0.200.16129%
Fund Existence15 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMHXNTK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XNTK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIE48.150.32
+0.67%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF
SPE13.380.06
+0.45%
Special Opportunities Fund
KNOV32.250.11
+0.34%
Innovator U.S. Small Cp Pwr Buf ETF -Nov
PTF102.36-0.60
-0.58%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology MomtETF
EWV16.86-0.34
-2.00%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
-0.40%
LRCX - SMH
89%
Closely correlated
+1.12%
AMAT - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
KLAC - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
ASML - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
TSM - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
More

XNTK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XNTK has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XNTK jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XNTK
1D Price
Change %
XNTK100%
-0.08%
TSM - XNTK
78%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
ADI - XNTK
73%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
ABNB - XNTK
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
SE - XNTK
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
SNOW - XNTK
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.58%
More