It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SNOA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SNOA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SNOA (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +1.13% price change this week, while TAK (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -0.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.74%.
SNOA is expected to report earnings on Nov 08, 2024.
TAK is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
SNOA | TAK | SNOA / TAK | |
Capitalization | 2.39M | 43.1B | 0% |
EBITDA | -4.27M | 1.01T | -0% |
Gain YTD | -25.721 | -5.795 | 444% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 36.79 | - |
Revenue | 12.3M | 4.17T | 0% |
Total Cash | 2.41M | 317B | 0% |
Total Debt | 385K | 4.66T | 0% |
SNOA | TAK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TAK's Valuation (7) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNOA (72) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that TAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNOA’s over the last 12 months.
TAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as SNOA (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that TAK’s stock grew similarly to SNOA’s over the last 12 months.
TAK's SMR Rating (83) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as SNOA (98) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that TAK’s stock grew similarly to SNOA’s over the last 12 months.
TAK's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as SNOA (83) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry. This means that TAK’s stock grew similarly to SNOA’s over the last 12 months.
SNOA's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Pharmaceuticals Other industry is in the same range as TAK (92) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that SNOA’s stock grew similarly to TAK’s over the last 12 months.
SNOA | TAK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago43% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago39% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago52% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago44% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago43% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago89% | 5 days ago45% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 1 day ago51% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago37% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNOA and BNXTF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNOA and BNXTF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNOA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNOA | 100% | +1.90% | ||
BNXTF - SNOA | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BGLAF - SNOA | 27% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
OGI - SNOA | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.28% | ||
AKAN - SNOA | 25% Poorly correlated | +16.31% | ||
TAK - SNOA | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAK has been loosely correlated with SGIOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAK jumps, then SGIOY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TAK | 100% | +0.53% | ||
SGIOY - TAK | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
ESAIY - TAK | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
BNXTF - TAK | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
TKPHF - TAK | 27% Poorly correlated | -5.96% | ||
ELAN - TAK | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.98% | ||
More |