SOCLF
Price
$0.31
Change
+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
SPGYF
Price
$7.61
Change
-$0.43 (-5.35%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

SOCLF vs SPGYF

Header iconSOCLF vs SPGYF Comparison
Open Charts SOCLF vs SPGYFBanner chart's image
Pharos Energy
Price$0.31
Change+$0.01 (+3.33%)
Volume$29.48K
CapitalizationN/A
Whitecap Resources
Price$7.61
Change-$0.43 (-5.35%)
Volume$23.81K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
SOCLF vs SPGYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SPGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
SOCLF vs. SPGYF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOCLF is a Hold and SPGYF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SOCLF: $0.31 vs. SPGYF: $7.61)
Brand notoriety: SOCLF and SPGYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SOCLF: 306% vs. SPGYF: 40%
Market capitalization -- SOCLF: $133.66M vs. SPGYF: $4.81B
SOCLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $133.66M. SPGYF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $4.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SOCLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSPGYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SOCLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SPGYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOCLF is a better buy in the long-term than SPGYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPGYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SPGYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SOCLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPGYF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +5.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+5.13% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPGYF($4.81B) has a higher market cap than SOCLF($134M). SPGYF has higher P/E ratio than SOCLF: SPGYF (5.96) vs SOCLF (5.46). SPGYF YTD gains are higher at: 13.149 vs. SOCLF (10.714). SPGYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.38B vs. SOCLF (174M). SOCLF has more cash in the bank: 47.5M vs. SPGYF (0). SOCLF has less debt than SPGYF: SOCLF (83.3M) vs SPGYF (1.29B). SPGYF has higher revenues than SOCLF: SPGYF (4.19B) vs SOCLF (187M).
SOCLFSPGYFSOCLF / SPGYF
Capitalization134M4.81B3%
EBITDA174M2.38B7%
Gain YTD10.71413.14981%
P/E Ratio5.465.9692%
Revenue187M4.19B4%
Total Cash47.5M0-
Total Debt83.3M1.29B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SOCLF vs SPGYF: Fundamental Ratings
SOCLF
SPGYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4880
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
6159
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1454
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPGYF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is in the same range as SOCLF (28). This means that SPGYF’s stock grew similarly to SOCLF’s over the last 12 months.

SPGYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOCLF (100). This means that SPGYF’s stock grew significantly faster than SOCLF’s over the last 12 months.

SPGYF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SOCLF (61). This means that SPGYF’s stock grew similarly to SOCLF’s over the last 12 months.

SOCLF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SPGYF (57). This means that SOCLF’s stock grew similarly to SPGYF’s over the last 12 months.

SOCLF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPGYF (54). This means that SOCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPGYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPGYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SPGYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

SOCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOCLF and SNVFF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOCLF and SNVFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOCLF
1D Price
Change %
SOCLF100%
N/A
SNVFF - SOCLF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQZZF - SOCLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPND - SOCLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-6.14%
STGAF - SOCLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPGYF - SOCLF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

SPGYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPGYF has been closely correlated with VRN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPGYF jumps, then VRN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPGYF
1D Price
Change %
SPGYF100%
+0.09%
VRN - SPGYF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
BTE - SPGYF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
VET - SPGYF
75%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
MEGEF - SPGYF
75%
Closely correlated
N/A
ZPTAF - SPGYF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
More