SOXS
Price
$52.86
Change
+$3.84 (+7.83%)
Updated
Sep 1, 03:23 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.38B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SQQQ
Price
$39.94
Change
+$1.43 (+3.71%)
Updated
Sep 1, 02:16 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.94B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SOXS vs SQQQ

SOXS vs SQQQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 16, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (SOXS) vs. ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs are leveraged inverse products seeking daily results that correspond to three times the inverse (-3x) of their respective benchmarks, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical use rather than long-term holding.
  • SOXS provides concentrated exposure to the semiconductor sector through the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, while SQQQ offers broader inverse exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index, which includes large-cap technology and growth companies across multiple sectors.
  • Expense ratios are elevated due to the complexity of daily leverage and derivatives: 1.00% for SOXS and 0.95% for SQQQ.
  • Both funds employ swap agreements and other derivatives rather than direct short positions in individual equities, resulting in minimal traditional holdings and daily rebalancing to maintain target leverage.
  • Risk profiles differ in scope: SOXS amplifies volatility tied to semiconductor-specific cycles, while SQQQ captures broader technology and growth-stock movements within the Nasdaq-100.
  • Structural similarities include daily reset mechanisms that can lead to compounding effects over multiple periods, emphasizing their role as tactical tools in volatile market environments.

Introduction

Investors seeking inverse exposure to technology-driven markets often evaluate leveraged products like SOXS and SQQQ. These ETFs do not compete directly as substitutes but offer differentiated strategies within the broader inverse-technology space. SOXS targets the specialized semiconductor industry, whereas SQQQ provides inverse leverage to the wider Nasdaq-100 universe. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions, exposure profiles, and positioning amid ongoing semiconductor innovation and technology-sector dynamics.

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X Shares (SOXS) Overview

SOXS seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the inverse of the daily performance of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. The fund is a leveraged inverse ETF that uses swaps and other derivatives to achieve its -3x daily target. It maintains a concentrated focus on approximately 30 U.S.-listed semiconductor companies involved in design, manufacturing, and equipment. Expense ratio stands at 1.00%. Holdings consist primarily of cash equivalents and derivative instruments rather than direct equity positions. The strategy requires daily rebalancing to reset leverage, distinguishing it as a high-volatility, sector-specific tactical vehicle.

ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) Overview

SQQQ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to three times the inverse (-3x) of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. This leveraged inverse ETF employs swaps and derivatives to deliver its targeted exposure across the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq. Expense ratio is 0.95%. The fund’s portfolio relies on financial instruments rather than a large number of individual stock holdings, with daily rebalancing to maintain the leverage ratio. It provides broader technology and growth-oriented inverse exposure compared with sector-specific alternatives.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor and broader technology sectors continue to experience rapid innovation driven by artificial intelligence, advanced computing, and data-center expansion. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations, supply-chain dynamics, and geopolitical tensions influence capital flows into these areas. Regulatory developments around export controls and domestic manufacturing incentives also shape the environment. Both ETFs operate within this high-growth yet cyclical backdrop, where earnings cycles of leading technology firms and shifts in investor sentiment toward risk assets serve as primary performance drivers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SOXS has exhibited heightened sensitivity to semiconductor-specific news and earnings, resulting in amplified volatility relative to broader market movements. SQQQ has tracked inverse performance of the Nasdaq-100, responding to sector rotation between growth and value styles as well as overall technology earnings trends. The narrower focus of SOXS typically produces greater day-to-day swings during semiconductor downturns, while SQQQ offers exposure to a more diversified set of large-cap technology names. Relative positioning depends on the prevailing momentum within semiconductors versus the broader Nasdaq-100 constituents.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to SQQQ in the current environment due to its slightly lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the Nasdaq-100, and consistent liquidity profile. SOXS offers compelling targeted exposure for those with a specific semiconductor view but carries higher concentration risk. Selection ultimately depends on an investor’s tactical outlook on sector breadth versus depth.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 1.66B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 1.38B to 1.94B. SQQQ holds the highest valuation in this group at 1.94B. The lowest valued company is SOXS at 1.38B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -4%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -11%, and the average quarterly price growth was 57%. SOXS experienced the highest price growth at -3%, while SQQQ experienced the biggest fall at -4%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was -20%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was -54% and the average quarterly volume growth was 296%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
SOXS vs. SQQQ commentary
Sep 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOXS is a Hold and SQQQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SQQQ has more net assets: 1.94B vs. SOXS (1.38B). SQQQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SOXS: SQQQ (-42.419) vs SOXS (-92.074). SOXS was incepted earlier than SQQQ: SOXS (16 years) vs SQQQ (17 years). SQQQ (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than SOXS (1.00).
SOXSSQQQSOXS / SQQQ
Gain YTD-92.074-42.419217%
Net Assets1.38B1.94B71%
Total Expense Ratio1.000.95105%
Turnover0.00N/A-
Yield41.769.13457%
Fund Existence16 years17 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SOXSSQQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SOXS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADNCX22.110.30
+1.38%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov C
HNCSX24.54N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth R4
SPIDX82.84N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500 Index Y
OBMCX68.17N/A
N/A
Oberweis Micro-Cap
RWIFX82.65-0.38
-0.46%
American Funds Cptl Wld Gr&Inc R-5