Ad is loading...
SPSAX vs SSGSX
SPSAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SPSAX vs SSGSX
Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq A
Price$17.10
Change+$0.18 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.99M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.06
Change+$0.33 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
SPSAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SPSAX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPSAX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. SPSAX (85M). SPSAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: SPSAX (1.23) vs SSGSX (0.52). SPSAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SPSAX (15 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than SPSAX (1.09). SPSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 154.69 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SPSAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SPSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: SPSAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SPSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.81 vs. SSGSX (-15.28). SPSAX return over 5 years is better than : 79.22 vs. SSGSX (22.94).
| SPSAX | SSGSX | SPSAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 1.26 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.320 | -14.430 | 92% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85M | 5.29B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.52 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.81 | -15.28 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.03 | -16.96 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 79.22 | 22.94 | 345% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.99 | 1.36 | 1,543% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers