SPXCY
Price
$18.22
Change
-$0.06 (-0.33%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
WSFL
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Updated
Apr 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

SPXCY vs WSFL

Header iconSPXCY vs WSFL Comparison
Open Charts SPXCY vs WSFLBanner chart's image
Singapore Exchange
Price$18.22
Change-$0.06 (-0.33%)
Volume$17.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Woodstock Holdings
Price$0.07
Change-$0.03 (-30.00%)
Volume$29.3K
CapitalizationN/A
SPXCY vs WSFL Comparison Chart
Loading...
SPXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SPXCY vs. WSFL commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPXCY is a Buy and WSFL is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (SPXCY: $18.22 vs. WSFL: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: SPXCY and WSFL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SPXCY: 36% vs. WSFL: 100%
Market capitalization -- SPXCY: $7.76B vs. WSFL: $1.44M
SPXCY [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $7.76B. WSFL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPXCY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SPXCY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WSFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPXCY is a better buy in the long-term than WSFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPXCY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SPXCY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

SPXCY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while WSFL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.18% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXCY($7.76B) has a higher market cap than WSFL($1.44M). SPXCY YTD gains are higher at: 66.049 vs. WSFL (-35.185). SPXCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 724M vs. WSFL (-185.04K). SPXCY has higher revenues than WSFL: SPXCY (1.15B) vs WSFL (10.9M).
SPXCYWSFLSPXCY / WSFL
Capitalization7.76B1.44M537,188%
EBITDA724M-185.04K-391,275%
Gain YTD66.049-35.185-188%
P/E Ratio20.53N/A-
Revenue1.15B10.9M10,541%
Total CashN/A1.57M-
Total DebtN/A910K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPXCY vs WSFL: Fundamental Ratings
SPXCY
WSFL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1100
SMR RATING
1..100
25100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3972
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
28100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WSFL's Valuation (82) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCY (95). This means that WSFL’s stock grew similarly to SPXCY’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSFL (100). This means that SPXCY’s stock grew significantly faster than WSFL’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCY's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSFL (100). This means that SPXCY’s stock grew significantly faster than WSFL’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSFL (72). This means that SPXCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSFL’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCY's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSFL (100). This means that SPXCY’s stock grew significantly faster than WSFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPXCYWSFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
32%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SPXCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SDGCX84.601.00
+1.20%
DWS Capital Growth C
HGXTX15.500.15
+0.98%
Hartford Global Impact R5
MLAAX9.690.09
+0.94%
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth Class A
AFAVX12.980.12
+0.93%
AMG River Road Focused Absolute Value I
UMEMX13.300.06
+0.45%
Columbia Emerging Markets Inst

SPXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXCY and SPXCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXCY and SPXCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXCY
1D Price
Change %
SPXCY100%
-0.31%
SPXCF - SPXCY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNEX - SPXCY
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
OPY - SPXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
JPXGY - SPXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
TOP - SPXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
More

WSFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WSFL and SLNH have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WSFL and SLNH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFL
1D Price
Change %
WSFL100%
N/A
SLNH - WSFL
23%
Poorly correlated
+9.00%
ASXFF - WSFL
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMXXF - WSFL
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
SPXCY - WSFL
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
PWP - WSFL
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
More