Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SQMCX vs VMATX
SQMCX vs VMATX Comparison
Open Charts SQMCX vs VMATX
DWS Massachusetts Tax Free C
Price$12.74
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.41M
Vanguard MA Tax-Exempt I
Price$9.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.97B
SQMCX vs VMATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SQMCX vs. VMATX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SQMCX is a Hold and VMATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMATX has more cash in the bank: 2.97B vs. SQMCX (190M). VMATX pays higher dividends than SQMCX: VMATX (3.64) vs SQMCX (2.06). SQMCX was incepted earlier than VMATX: SQMCX (24 years) vs VMATX (27 years). SQMCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than VMATX (0.09). VMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. SQMCX (32.00). SQMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMATX: SQMCX (1000) vs VMATX (3000). SQMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.29 vs. VMATX (-4.59). SQMCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.66 vs. VMATX (-14.01).
| SQMCX | VMATX | SQMCX / VMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 0.09 | 1,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.09 | 1,967% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.805 | -3.363 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 2.97B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 3.64 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.29 | -4.59 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.81 | -2.65 | -68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.66 | -14.01 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.79 | -8.95 | -54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement