Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SQMCX vs VMATX
SQMCX vs VMATX Comparison
Open Charts SQMCX vs VMATX
DWS Massachusetts Tax Free C
Price$12.70
Change-$0.03 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.23M
Vanguard MA Tax-Exempt I
Price$9.72
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.83B
SQMCX vs VMATX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SQMCX vs. VMATX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SQMCX is a Hold and VMATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMATX has more cash in the bank: 2.83B vs. SQMCX (195M). VMATX pays higher dividends than SQMCX: VMATX (3.61) vs SQMCX (2.01). SQMCX was incepted earlier than VMATX: SQMCX (24 years) vs VMATX (27 years). SQMCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than VMATX (0.09). VMATX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. SQMCX (52.00). SQMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VMATX: SQMCX (1000) vs VMATX (3000). SQMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.00 vs. VMATX (-3.66). SQMCX return over 5 years is better than : -5.39 vs. VMATX (-12.75).
| SQMCX | VMATX | SQMCX / VMATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.09 | 1,778% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 0.09 | 1,900% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.244 | -3.660 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 195M | 2.83B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 3.61 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.00 | -3.66 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.40 | -4.56 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.39 | -12.75 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.63 | -8.12 | -69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers