SRBIF
Price
$1.63
Change
+$0.02 (+1.24%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
25.31M
38 days until earnings call
TRGGF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.25M
Ad is loading...

SRBIF vs TRGGF

Header iconSRBIF vs TRGGF Comparison
Open Charts SRBIF vs TRGGFBanner chart's image
Serabi Gold
Price$1.63
Change+$0.02 (+1.24%)
Volume$23.02K
Capitalization25.31M
Tarachi Gold
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.04K
Capitalization2.25M
SRBIF vs TRGGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SRBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRBIF vs. TRGGF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRBIF is a Hold and TRGGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (SRBIF: $1.63 vs. TRGGF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: SRBIF and TRGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRBIF: 528% vs. TRGGF: 2%
Market capitalization -- SRBIF: $25.31M vs. TRGGF: $2.25M
SRBIF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.31M. TRGGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRBIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SRBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRBIF is a better buy in the long-term than TRGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRBIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRGGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRBIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TRGGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRGGF is a better buy in the short-term than SRBIF.

Price Growth

SRBIF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +16.43% price change this week, while TRGGF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

SRBIF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRBIF($25.3M) has a higher market cap than TRGGF($2.25M). SRBIF YTD gains are higher at: 14.386 vs. TRGGF (0.000). SRBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.3M vs. TRGGF (-1.07M). SRBIF has more cash in the bank: 13.9M vs. TRGGF (252K). TRGGF has less debt than SRBIF: TRGGF (71.5K) vs SRBIF (12M). SRBIF has higher revenues than TRGGF: SRBIF (59.3M) vs TRGGF (0).
SRBIFTRGGFSRBIF / TRGGF
Capitalization25.3M2.25M1,125%
EBITDA9.3M-1.07M-870%
Gain YTD14.3860.000-
P/E Ratio16.64N/A-
Revenue59.3M0-
Total Cash13.9M252K5,516%
Total Debt12M71.5K16,783%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRBIF: Fundamental Ratings
SRBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56
SMR RATING
1..100
46
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRBIFTRGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SRBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASHR25.930.33
+1.29%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF
AVDS51.740.22
+0.43%
Avantis International Small Cp Eq ETF
BNGE28.380.12
+0.42%
First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF
PTIN28.090.11
+0.39%
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
EMHY38.360.02
+0.05%
iShares J.P. Morgan EM High Yld Bd ETF

SRBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRBIF has been loosely correlated with GSMGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRBIF jumps, then GSMGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRBIF
1D Price
Change %
SRBIF100%
+1.24%
GSMGF - SRBIF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GMDMF - SRBIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WGXRF - SRBIF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
GNSMF - SRBIF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBKF - SRBIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRGGF and SLRRF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRGGF and SLRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRGGF
1D Price
Change %
TRGGF100%
N/A
SLRRF - TRGGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNGZF - TRGGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSMGF - TRGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLTMF - TRGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBIF - TRGGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More