Ad is loading...
SSGSX vs TNVAX
SSGSX vs TNVAX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TNVAX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$43.19
Change-$0.22 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96B
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value A
Price$16.31
Change+$0.07 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets151.46M
SSGSX vs TNVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TNVAX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and TNVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. TNVAX (151M). TNVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TNVAX (0.82) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TNVAX: SSGSX (26 years) vs TNVAX (10 years). TNVAX (1.47) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TNVAX (11.00). SSGSX (6%) and TNVAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. TNVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TNVAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). TNVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.55 vs. SSGSX (-9.07). TNVAX return over 5 years is better than : 98.11 vs. SSGSX (43.77).
| SSGSX | TNVAX | SSGSX / TNVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.20 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.47 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.504 | -4.524 | 144% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.96B | 151M | 3,948% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.82 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.07 | -3.55 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.69 | 6.09 | -159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.77 | 98.11 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.59 | 65.20 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...