SUHJF
Price
$10.47
Change
-$0.30 (-2.79%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
36.26B
SVAUF
Price
$3.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SUHJF vs SVAUF

Header iconSUHJF vs SVAUF Comparison
Open Charts SUHJF vs SVAUFBanner chart's image
Sun Hung Kai Properties
Price$10.47
Change-$0.30 (-2.79%)
Volume$458
Capitalization36.26B
Storagevault Canada
Price$3.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.48K
Capitalization1.42B
SUHJF vs SVAUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SUHJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SUHJF vs. SVAUF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SUHJF is a Hold and SVAUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (SUHJF: $10.47 vs. SVAUF: $3.02)
Brand notoriety: SUHJF and SVAUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SUHJF: 18% vs. SVAUF: 48%
Market capitalization -- SUHJF: $36.26B vs. SVAUF: $1.42B
SUHJF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $36.26B. SVAUF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SUHJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSVAUF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SUHJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SVAUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUHJF is a better buy in the long-term than SVAUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SUHJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVAUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SUHJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SVAUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVAUF is a better buy in the short-term than SUHJF.

Price Growth

SUHJF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -2.82% price change this week, while SVAUF (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

SVAUF is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.06% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUHJF($36.3B) has a higher market cap than SVAUF($1.42B). SVAUF has higher P/E ratio than SUHJF: SVAUF (2664.07) vs SUHJF (15.11). SVAUF YTD gains are higher at: 10.328 vs. SUHJF (9.155). SUHJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. SVAUF (178M). SUHJF has more cash in the bank: 18.5B vs. SVAUF (13.9M). SVAUF has less debt than SUHJF: SVAUF (1.77B) vs SUHJF (133B). SUHJF has higher revenues than SVAUF: SUHJF (65B) vs SVAUF (289M).
SUHJFSVAUFSUHJF / SVAUF
Capitalization36.3B1.42B2,558%
EBITDA25.8B178M14,494%
Gain YTD9.15510.32889%
P/E Ratio15.112664.071%
Revenue65B289M22,491%
Total Cash18.5B13.9M133,094%
Total Debt133B1.77B7,497%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SUHJF vs SVAUF: Fundamental Ratings
SUHJF
SVAUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9434
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4652
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1045
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUHJF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SVAUF (98). This means that SUHJF’s stock grew significantly faster than SVAUF’s over the last 12 months.

SVAUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as SUHJF (100). This means that SVAUF’s stock grew similarly to SUHJF’s over the last 12 months.

SVAUF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SUHJF (100). This means that SVAUF’s stock grew similarly to SUHJF’s over the last 12 months.

SUHJF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SVAUF (52). This means that SUHJF’s stock grew similarly to SVAUF’s over the last 12 months.

SUHJF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVAUF (45). This means that SUHJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVAUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SUHJFSVAUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUHJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVAUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBET37.388.41
+29.03%
SharpLink Gaming Inc
ALLY39.330.29
+0.74%
Ally Financial
FIHL15.800.05
+0.32%
Fidelis Insurance Holdings Limited
PROV15.43-0.02
-0.13%
Provident Financial Holdings
HDSN8.02-0.02
-0.25%
Hudson Technologies

SUHJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUHJF and AYAAF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUHJF and AYAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUHJF
1D Price
Change %
SUHJF100%
N/A
AYAAF - SUHJF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYPF - SUHJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DUO - SUHJF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
SVAUF - SUHJF
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
AXR - SUHJF
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
More

SVAUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVAUF and AANNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVAUF and AANNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVAUF
1D Price
Change %
SVAUF100%
+0.10%
AANNF - SVAUF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
DRUNF - SVAUF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
VONOY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
DTCWY - SVAUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JLL - SVAUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
More