SULZF
Price
$145.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
WHTAF
Price
$42.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

SULZF vs WHTAF

Header iconSULZF vs WHTAF Comparison
Open Charts SULZF vs WHTAFBanner chart's image
Sulzer AG
Price$145.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$135
CapitalizationN/A
WashTec AG AUGSBURG
Price$42.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
SULZF vs WHTAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
SULZF vs. WHTAF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SULZF is a Hold and WHTAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SULZF: $145.00 vs. WHTAF: $42.00)
Brand notoriety: SULZF and WHTAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SULZF: 110% vs. WHTAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- SULZF: $3.34B vs. WHTAF: $517.03M
SULZF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $3.34B. WHTAF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $517.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SULZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWHTAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SULZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WHTAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SULZF is a better buy in the long-term than WHTAF.

Price Growth

SULZF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WHTAF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.35% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SULZF($3.34B) has a higher market cap than WHTAF($517M). WHTAF has higher P/E ratio than SULZF: WHTAF (23.81) vs SULZF (14.25). SULZF YTD gains are higher at: 67.456 vs. WHTAF (11.851). SULZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 412M vs. WHTAF (55.1M). SULZF has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. WHTAF (18.4M). WHTAF has less debt than SULZF: WHTAF (61.3M) vs SULZF (1.46B). SULZF has higher revenues than WHTAF: SULZF (3.27B) vs WHTAF (455M).
SULZFWHTAFSULZF / WHTAF
Capitalization3.34B517M645%
EBITDA412M55.1M748%
Gain YTD67.45611.851569%
P/E Ratio14.2523.8160%
Revenue3.27B455M718%
Total Cash1.16B18.4M6,293%
Total Debt1.46B61.3M2,388%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SULZF: Fundamental Ratings
SULZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

SULZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SULZF has been loosely correlated with RATIY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SULZF jumps, then RATIY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SULZF
1D Price
Change %
SULZF100%
N/A
RATIY - SULZF
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MCRUF - SULZF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNEY - SULZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
SMEGF - SULZF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.80%
WHTAF - SULZF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WHTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHTAF has been closely correlated with KRNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WHTAF jumps, then KRNNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHTAF
1D Price
Change %
WHTAF100%
N/A
KRNNF - WHTAF
86%
Closely correlated
N/A
YOKEY - WHTAF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PSIX - WHTAF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
IRRHF - WHTAF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSCR - WHTAF
25%
Poorly correlated
+16.62%
More