SURDF
Price
$38.44
Change
+$3.40 (+9.70%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
12.81B
UCASU
Price
$1.03
Change
+$0.28 (+37.33%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.49M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SURDF vs UCASU

Header iconSURDF vs UCASU Comparison
Open Charts SURDF vs UCASUBanner chart's image
Sumitomo Realty & Development
Price$38.44
Change+$3.40 (+9.70%)
Volume$552
Capitalization12.81B
UC Asset
Price$1.03
Change+$0.28 (+37.33%)
Volume$349
Capitalization5.49M
SURDF vs UCASU Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SURDF vs. UCASU commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SURDF is a Hold and UCASU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SURDF: $38.44 vs. UCASU: $1.03)
Brand notoriety: SURDF and UCASU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SURDF: 160% vs. UCASU: 15%
Market capitalization -- SURDF: $12.81B vs. UCASU: $5.49M
SURDF [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $12.81B. UCASU’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $5.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SURDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUCASU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SURDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UCASU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SURDF and UCASU are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

SURDF (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UCASU (@Real Estate Development) price change was -20.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.72% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SURDF($12.8B) has a higher market cap than UCASU($5.49M). SURDF has higher P/E ratio than UCASU: SURDF (10.91) vs UCASU (5.80). UCASU YTD gains are higher at: 46.886 vs. SURDF (21.661). UCASU has less debt than SURDF: UCASU (400K) vs SURDF (3.68T). SURDF has higher revenues than UCASU: SURDF (925B) vs UCASU (7.01M).
SURDFUCASUSURDF / UCASU
Capitalization12.8B5.49M233,364%
EBITDA247BN/A-
Gain YTD21.66146.88646%
P/E Ratio10.915.80188%
Revenue925B7.01M13,187,910%
Total Cash161BN/A-
Total Debt3.68T400K920,500,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SURDF: Fundamental Ratings
SURDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
48
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMBLX12.30N/A
N/A
MassMutual Balanced Adm
RGNCX31.24N/A
N/A
Victory Global Energy Transition C
EVIFX12.02N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Balanced A
TRSEX16.92N/A
N/A
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity Ret
VISVX45.44N/A
N/A
Vanguard Small Cap Value Index Inv

SURDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SURDF has been loosely correlated with SRRLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SURDF jumps, then SRRLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SURDF
1D Price
Change %
SURDF100%
N/A
SRRLF - SURDF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTOUF - SURDF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRGTF - SURDF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MITEF - SURDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRUNF - SURDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UCASU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UCASU and WARFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UCASU and WARFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCASU
1D Price
Change %
UCASU100%
+37.55%
WARFF - UCASU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRRE - UCASU
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SURDF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UILCF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VESTF - UCASU
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More