SVIIU
Price
$11.68
Change
+$0.33 (+2.91%)
Updated
Jan 24 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
YOTA
Price
$11.75
Change
+$0.12 (+1.03%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
42.64M
Ad is loading...

SVIIU vs YOTA

Header iconSVIIU vs YOTA Comparison
Open Charts SVIIU vs YOTABanner chart's image
Spring Valley Acquisition
Price$11.68
Change+$0.33 (+2.91%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Yotta Acquisition
Price$11.75
Change+$0.12 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization42.64M
SVIIU vs YOTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
SVIIU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SVIIU vs. YOTA commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SVIIU is a StrongBuy and YOTA is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (SVIIU: $11.68 vs. YOTA: $11.76)
Brand notoriety: SVIIU and YOTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SVIIU: 101% vs. YOTA: 10%
Market capitalization -- SVIIU: $0 vs. YOTA: $42.64M
SVIIU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. YOTA’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $42.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SVIIU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYOTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SVIIU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YOTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVIIU is a better buy in the long-term than YOTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SVIIU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SVIIU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

SVIIU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +2.86% price change this week, while YOTA (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +4.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

YOTA is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.50% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YOTA YTD gains are higher at: 4.348 vs. SVIIU (3.227). SVIIU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -875.46K vs. YOTA (-2.38M). SVIIU has more cash in the bank: 1.24M vs. YOTA (460K). SVIIU has less debt than YOTA: SVIIU (269K) vs YOTA (1.27M). SVIIU (0) and YOTA (0) have equivalent revenues.
SVIIUYOTASVIIU / YOTA
CapitalizationN/A42.6M-
EBITDA-875.46K-2.38M37%
Gain YTD3.2274.34874%
P/E RatioN/A102.90-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.24M460K270%
Total Debt269K1.27M21%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SVIIUYOTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
39%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
5%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SVIIU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTSOX39.110.70
+1.82%
Calamos Timpani Small Cap Growth R6
GGHSX40.370.45
+1.13%
Invesco Health Care R6
HEORX16.34N/A
N/A
Hartford Climate Opportunities R3
FCDCX31.62N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp C
VDMCX8.66N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Developing Markets C

SVIIU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SVIIU has been loosely correlated with FCIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SVIIU jumps, then FCIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVIIU
1D Price
Change %
SVIIU100%
N/A
FCIC - SVIIU
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HAIUF - SVIIU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YOTA - SVIIU
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCVI - SVIIU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NGRC - SVIIU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YOTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YOTA has been loosely correlated with PORT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YOTA jumps, then PORT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YOTA
1D Price
Change %
YOTA100%
N/A
PORT - YOTA
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GDST - YOTA
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
SVIIU - YOTA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYNOU - YOTA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YOTAU - YOTA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More